Corral v. Federal Express Corporation et al
Filing
30
ORDER Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 1/24/2012. (dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/24/2012)
Case3:10-cv-05965-TEH Document29 Filed01/24/12 Page1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
WAUKEEN Q. McCOY, ESQ. (SBN: 168228)
LAW OFFICES OF WAUKEEN Q. McCOY
703 Market Street, Suite 1300
San Francisco, California 94103
Telephone (415) 675-7705
Facsimile (415) 675-2530
Attorney for Plaintiff
CHARLES CORRAL
CHARLES W. MATHEIS, JR., ESQ. (SBN: 82476)
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
2601 Main Street, Suite 340
Irvine, CA 92614
Telephone: (949) 862-4638
Facsimile: (949) 862-4605
Attorney for Defendant
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
11
12
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
CHARLES CORRAL,
Plaintiff,
v.
FEDERAL EXPRESS, a corporation,
GLEN DUNLOP, an individual, AND
DOES 1-10.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: CV-10-05965-TEH
STIPULATION BY THE PARTIES TO
CONTINUE THE MANDATORY
SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
Complaint Filed: November 22, 2010
Trial Date: August 7, 2012
22
23
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Charles Corral (“Plaintiff”) and
24
Defendant Federal Express Corporation, through their respective counsel, and subject to
25
approval by the Court, that the mandatory settlement conference be continued from February 6,
26
2012 to April 24, 2012. This continuance is necessary because of unavoidable changes in
27
scheduling and calendaring conflicts that have resulted in a delay in discovery. Discovery has
28
not been completed to an extent sufficient to allow the parties to fully prepare for the February 6,
STIPULATION BY THE PARTIES TO CONTINUE THE MANDATORY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
CASE NO. CV-10-05965-TEH
1
Case3:10-cv-05965-TEH Document29 Filed01/24/12 Page2 of 2
1
2012 conference. The parties are currently cooperatively engaged in written discovery as well as
2
actively pursuing deposition testimony. Plaintiff’s deposition is currently scheduled for February
3
14, 2012.
4
5
6
The Parties also request that the conference begin at 10:00 AM or later in order to
accommodate Defendant’s counsel’s travel schedule.
Trial is currently scheduled for August 7, 2012. Judge Henderson previously moved the
7
pre-trial conference to July 16, 2012, and His Honor ordered that this mandatory settlement
8
conference conclude more than five days before such date. The proposed date of April 24, 2012
9
is well within the time allowed.
10
So Stipulated:
11
DATED: January 23, 2011
LAW OFFICES OF WAUKEEN Q. McCOY
By:________/s/ Waukeen Q. McCoy__________
Waukeen Q. McCoy, Esq.
Attorney for Charles Corral
12
13
14
15
DATED: January 23, 2011
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
16
By:______/s/ Charles W. Matheis, Jr __________
Charles W. Matheis, Jr., Esq.
Attorney for Federal Express Corporation
18
19
S
ER
H
26
na M. R
ge DonJudge
United StatesJud
Magistrate
FO
RT
25
_________________________________
DONNA M. RYU
yu
NO
24
D
LI
23
TE
GRAN
A
22
IT IS SO ORDERED.
January 24
Dated: ____________ ____, 2012
UNIT
ED
21
RT
U
O
20
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
R NIA
17
N
D IS T IC T
R
OF
27
28
STIPULATION BY THE PARTIES TO CONTINUE THE MANDATORY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
CASE NO. CV-10-05965-TEH
2
C
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?