Corral v. Federal Express Corporation et al

Filing 30

ORDER Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 1/24/2012. (dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/24/2012)

Download PDF
Case3:10-cv-05965-TEH Document29 Filed01/24/12 Page1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 WAUKEEN Q. McCOY, ESQ. (SBN: 168228) LAW OFFICES OF WAUKEEN Q. McCOY 703 Market Street, Suite 1300 San Francisco, California 94103 Telephone (415) 675-7705 Facsimile (415) 675-2530 Attorney for Plaintiff CHARLES CORRAL CHARLES W. MATHEIS, JR., ESQ. (SBN: 82476) FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION 2601 Main Street, Suite 340 Irvine, CA 92614 Telephone: (949) 862-4638 Facsimile: (949) 862-4605 Attorney for Defendant FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION 11 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 CHARLES CORRAL, Plaintiff, v. FEDERAL EXPRESS, a corporation, GLEN DUNLOP, an individual, AND DOES 1-10., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: CV-10-05965-TEH STIPULATION BY THE PARTIES TO CONTINUE THE MANDATORY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE Complaint Filed: November 22, 2010 Trial Date: August 7, 2012 22 23 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Charles Corral (“Plaintiff”) and 24 Defendant Federal Express Corporation, through their respective counsel, and subject to 25 approval by the Court, that the mandatory settlement conference be continued from February 6, 26 2012 to April 24, 2012. This continuance is necessary because of unavoidable changes in 27 scheduling and calendaring conflicts that have resulted in a delay in discovery. Discovery has 28 not been completed to an extent sufficient to allow the parties to fully prepare for the February 6, STIPULATION BY THE PARTIES TO CONTINUE THE MANDATORY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE CASE NO. CV-10-05965-TEH 1 Case3:10-cv-05965-TEH Document29 Filed01/24/12 Page2 of 2 1 2012 conference. The parties are currently cooperatively engaged in written discovery as well as 2 actively pursuing deposition testimony. Plaintiff’s deposition is currently scheduled for February 3 14, 2012. 4 5 6 The Parties also request that the conference begin at 10:00 AM or later in order to accommodate Defendant’s counsel’s travel schedule. Trial is currently scheduled for August 7, 2012. Judge Henderson previously moved the 7 pre-trial conference to July 16, 2012, and His Honor ordered that this mandatory settlement 8 conference conclude more than five days before such date. The proposed date of April 24, 2012 9 is well within the time allowed. 10 So Stipulated: 11 DATED: January 23, 2011 LAW OFFICES OF WAUKEEN Q. McCOY By:________/s/ Waukeen Q. McCoy__________ Waukeen Q. McCoy, Esq. Attorney for Charles Corral 12 13 14 15 DATED: January 23, 2011 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION 16 By:______/s/ Charles W. Matheis, Jr __________ Charles W. Matheis, Jr., Esq. Attorney for Federal Express Corporation 18 19 S ER H 26 na M. R ge DonJudge United StatesJud Magistrate FO RT 25 _________________________________ DONNA M. RYU yu NO 24 D LI 23 TE GRAN A 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. January 24 Dated: ____________ ____, 2012 UNIT ED 21 RT U O 20 S DISTRICT TE C TA R NIA 17 N D IS T IC T R OF 27 28 STIPULATION BY THE PARTIES TO CONTINUE THE MANDATORY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE CASE NO. CV-10-05965-TEH 2 C

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?