Xcentric Ventures, LLC v. Arden

Filing 35

ORDER EXTENDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/1/2011)

Download PDF
Xcentric Ventures, LLC v. Arden Doc. 35 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 JABURG & WILK, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 3200 NORTH CENTRAL AVENUE SUITE 2000 PHOENIX, ARIZONA 85012 Maria Crimi Speth, (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) JABURG & WILK, P.C. 3200 North Central Avenue, Suite 2000 Phoenix, Arizona 85012 mcs@jaburgwilk.com (602) 248-1000 David S. Gingras, CSB #218793 Gingras Law Office, PLLC 3941 East Chandler Boulevard #106-243 Phoenix, Arizona 85048 david@gingraslaw.com Tel.: (480) 668-3623 Fax: (480) 248-3196 Attorneys for Plaintiff UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA XCENTRIC VENTURES, LLC., an Arizona limited liability company, Plaintiff, v. ELIZABETH ARDEN d/b/a COMPLAINTSBOARD.COM; et al. Defendants. Case No: 3:10-mc-80058-SI PROPOSED ORDER RE: STIPULATION AND REQUEST FOR COURT ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR FILING OF PLAINTIFF'S REPLY TO DEFENDANT COMPLAINTSBOARD.COM'S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO ENFORCE PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION Hearing Date: Time: Courtroom: March 4, 2011 9:00 a.m. 10 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Having considered the parties' Stipulation and such other matters as the Court deems relevant, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT, Pursuant to the Stipulation, Plaintiff shall file its Reply to Defendant Complaintsboard.com's Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Enforce Preliminary Injunction by no later than February 25, 2011. The date to hear Plaintiff's Motion will remain on March 4, 2011. PROPOSED ORDER 10297-44/MCS/DAG/869749_v1 3:10-mc-80058-SI Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 JABURG & WILK, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 3200 NORTH CENTRAL AVENUE SUITE 2000 PHOENIX, ARIZONA 85012 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 2/28/11 Dated: 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 10297-44/MCS/DAG/869749_v1 PROPOSED ORDER 3:10-mc-80058-SI

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?