v. Yaiguaje

Filing 60

STIPULATION AND ORDER GOVERNING DISCLOSURE OF DOCUMENTS PER RULE 502 re 59 Stipulation filed by Diego Borja, Sara Portilla. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 3/11/11. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/11/2011)

Download PDF
v. Yaiguaje Doc. 60 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Cristina C. Arguedas (CSB 87787) Ted W. Cassman (CSB 98932) Michael W. Anderson (CSB 232525) ARGUEDAS, CASSMAN & HEADLEY LLP 803 Hearst Avenue Berkeley, CA 94710 Telephone: (510) 845-3000 Facsimile: (510) 845-3003 Attorneys for Diego Borja and Sara Portilla UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) Daniel Carlos Lusitand Yaiguaje, et al., ) ) ) Applicants, ) For the Issuance of a Subpoena for the ) ) Taking of a Deposition and the ) Production of Documents in a Foreign ) Proceeding Under 28 U.S.C. 1782. ________________________________ ) ) ) In re Application of: ) ) THE REPUBLIC OF ECUADOR, ) ) Applicant, ) For the Issuance of a Subpoena for the ) ) Taking of Depositions and the ) Production of Documents in a Foreign ) Proceeding Under 28 U.S.C. 1782. ________________________________ ) In re Application of: Case No. 10-MC-80324 CRB (EMC) Case No. 10-MC-80225 CRB (EMC) (Related case) [PROPOSED] STIPULATION AND ORDER GOVERNING DISCLOSURE OF DOCUMENTS PURSUANT TO RULE 502 OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 (3) (2) (1) THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE to the following: The purpose of this order is to allow disclosure of documents pursuant to the Court's Order of February 22, 2011 ("Documents") by Diego Borja, Sara Portilla, and their counsel ("the Borjas") to Daniel Carlos Lusitand Yaiguaje, et al. ("Applicants") while preserving all privileges and protections, including work product protection, that may apply to the documents prior to their disclosure. The parties agree that the Borjas' act of disclosing Documents to Applicants and/or any use the Borjas or Applicants make of the Documents in this proceeding does not constitute a waiver of any applicable attorney-client privilege or work product protection over the Documents, the communications contained therein, or their subject matter in this or any other proceeding, and that this agreement is to be interpreted to provide the greatest protection allowed under Federal Rule of Evidence 502, or otherwise permitted by law. Furthermore, the parties agree that Borja's act of providing testimony in response to a question concerning any Document produced under this Order will not constitute a waiver of any applicable attorney-client privilege or work product protection The parties agree that this Stipulation will constitute a binding agreement pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 502(d) and 502(e), and that Applicants will maintain the confidentiality of the Documents pursuant to the Court's Protective Order of February 25, 2011 (Dkt. No. 46). 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SO STIPULATED: Dated: March 10, 2011 By: /s/ Michael W. Anderson Arguedas, Cassman & Headley LLP Counsel for the Borjas Dated: March 10, 2011 By: /s/ James Tyrrell (admitted pro hac vice) Patton Boggs LLP Counsel for Applicants IT IS SO ORDERED. UNIT ED 3/11/11 Dated:_____________ S S DISTRICT TE C TA ER N F D IS T IC T O R 3 A C LI FO dwar Judge E d M. Ch en R NIA ERED _________________________ O ORDEdward M. Chen Mag. IT IS S Judge RT U O NO RT H

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?