Lee v. Stonebridge Life Insurance Company

Filing 109

STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING THE DEPOSITION OF CHANDLER GIVENS. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 5/14/13. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/14/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 DAN MARMALEFSKY (CA SBN 95477) dmarmalefsky@mofo.com MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 707 Wilshire Boulevard Los Angeles, California 90017-3543 Telephone: 213.892.5200 Facsimile: 213.892.5454 TIFFANY CHEUNG (CA SBN 211497) TCheung@mofo.com MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 425 Market Street San Francisco, California 94105-2482 Telephone: 415.268.7000 Facsimile: 415.268.7522 Attorneys for Defendant STONEBRIDGE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 14 15 JESSICA LEE, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated individuals, 16 Plaintiff, 17 v. Case No. CV 11-0043-RS [PROPOSED] STIPULATED ORDER REGARDING THE DEPOSITION OF CHANDLER GIVENS 18 19 20 21 STONEBRIDGE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Vermont corporation, and TRIFECTA MARKETING GROUP LLC, a Florida limited liability company, Judge: Hon. Richard Seeborg Action Filed: Jan. 4, 2011 Defendants. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] STIPULATED ORDER REGARDING THE DEPOSITION OF CHANDLER GIVENS CV 11-0043-RS sf-3282106 1 Defendant Stonebridge Life Insurance Company (“Stonebridge”), Trifecta Marketing 2 Group LLC (“Trifecta” and collectively with Stonebridge, “Defendants”) and Plaintiff Jessica 3 Lee (collectively with Defendants, the “parties”), by and through their respective counsel of 4 record, hereby enter into the following stipulation: 5 WHEREAS on October 18, 2012, Plaintiff filed the October 18, 2012 Declaration of 6 Chandler R. Givens in Support of Plaintiff’s Reply in Support of Motion for Class Certification 7 (“Givens Declaration”); 8 9 10 11 WHEREAS the Givens Declaration contains certain factual assertions concerning an alleged text message he received from Plaintiff; WHEREAS Stonebridge served a subpoena on Mr. Givens on April 17, 2013, calling for him to appear for deposition on May 8, 2013; 12 WHEREAS Stonebridge intends to depose Mr. Givens concerning, among other things, 13 the contents of the Givens Declaration and any testimony he might offer concerning attempts to 14 call the 877-711-5429 phone number shown in Exhibit 1 to the Givens Declaration (the “877 15 Number”) and the results of any such calls; 16 17 WHEREAS Mr. Givens is an attorney at the law firm of Edelson LLC (“Edelson”), Plaintiff’s counsel of record in this action; 18 WHEREAS Mr. Givens served objections to the subpoena served on him in this case; 19 WHEREAS the parties agree that it would be more efficient to stipulate to certain 20 evidentiary limitations rather than incur the time and expense of deposing Mr. Givens. 21 THEREFORE, the parties agree and stipulate as follows: 22 1. 23 24 25 26 Stonebridge agrees to withdraw the April 17, 2013 subpoena served on Mr. Givens in this action; 2. Defendants will not re-notice the deposition of Mr. Givens nor notice the deposition of any other current or former Edelson attorneys, employees, or representatives; 3. Plaintiff agrees that she will not offer any evidence in this action concerning any 27 phone calls made to the 877 Number by any current or former Edelson attorneys, employees, or 28 representatives, including but not limited to the contents of any conversations with persons who [PROPOSED] STIPULATED ORDER REGARDING THE DEPOSITION OF CHANDLER GIVENS CV 11-0043-RS sf-3282106 1 1 2 may have answered such calls; 4. Plaintiff further agrees that no Edelson attorneys, employees, or representatives 3 will offer any other oral or written testimony in this action, except for the Givens Declaration and 4 attorney declarations concerning matters that have occurred after January 4, 2011 (e.g., 5 authentication of documents). Except as set forth in paragraph 5 below, no former or current 6 Edelson attorney, employee, or representative will testify at any trial in this matter. 7 5. If a Defendant intends to present evidence at trial that refutes the contents of the 8 Givens Declaration, it will promptly notify Plaintiff of such intent. If a Defendant provides such 9 notice, Plaintiff may call Mr. Givens as a trial witness, but only if Plaintiff makes Mr. Givens 10 available for deposition within fourteen days of Defendant’s notice of intent to present the 11 refuting evidence at trial. If Mr. Givens’s deposition cannot be completed before fact discovery 12 has closed, Plaintiff agrees to join in a request to reopen fact discovery for the limited purpose of 13 deposing Mr. Givens regarding the matters expressed in the Givens Declaration. If called as a 14 witness at trial pursuant to the provisions of this paragraph, Mr. Givens’s testimony will be 15 limited to the matters expressed in the Givens Declaration. 16 IT IS SO STIPULATED 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] STIPULATED ORDER REGARDING THE DEPOSITION OF CHANDLER GIVENS CV 11-0043-RS sf-3282106 2 1 Dated: May 13, 2013 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 2 3 By: 4 5 6 Dated: May 13, 2013 7 /s/ Tiffany Cheung TIFFANY CHEUNG Attorneys for Defendant STONEBRIDGE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY LAW OFFICES OF ALEXANDER E. SKLAVOS, PC 8 By: 9 10 11 12 Dated: May 13, 2013 /s/ Alex Sklavos ALEX SKLAVOS Attorneys for Defendant TRIFECTA MARKETING GROUP LLC EDELSON LLC 13 14 15 16 By: /s/ John Ochoa JOHN OCHOA Attorneys for Plaintiff JESSICA LEE and the class 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] STIPULATED ORDER REGARDING THE DEPOSITION OF CHANDLER GIVENS CV 11-0043-RS sf-3282106 3 1 ATTESTATION OF FILER I, Tiffany Cheung, hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been 2 3 obtained from each of the other signatories. See L.R. 5-1(i)(3). 4 Dated: May 13, 2013 5 6 By: /s/ Tiffany Cheung TIFFANY CHEUNG MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 7 8 9 10 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED 11 12 13 14 Dated: 5/14/13 Hon. Richard Seeborg United States District Judge 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] STIPULATED ORDER REGARDING THE DEPOSITION OF CHANDLER GIVENS CV 11-0043-RS sf-3282106 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?