Lee v. Stonebridge Life Insurance Company
Filing
109
STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING THE DEPOSITION OF CHANDLER GIVENS. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 5/14/13. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/14/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
DAN MARMALEFSKY (CA SBN 95477)
dmarmalefsky@mofo.com
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
707 Wilshire Boulevard
Los Angeles, California 90017-3543
Telephone: 213.892.5200
Facsimile: 213.892.5454
TIFFANY CHEUNG (CA SBN 211497)
TCheung@mofo.com
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
425 Market Street
San Francisco, California 94105-2482
Telephone: 415.268.7000
Facsimile: 415.268.7522
Attorneys for Defendant
STONEBRIDGE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
10
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
14
15
JESSICA LEE, individually and on behalf of a
class of similarly situated individuals,
16
Plaintiff,
17
v.
Case No.
CV 11-0043-RS
[PROPOSED] STIPULATED
ORDER REGARDING THE
DEPOSITION OF CHANDLER
GIVENS
18
19
20
21
STONEBRIDGE LIFE INSURANCE
COMPANY, a Vermont corporation, and
TRIFECTA MARKETING GROUP LLC, a
Florida limited liability company,
Judge:
Hon. Richard Seeborg
Action Filed: Jan. 4, 2011
Defendants.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] STIPULATED ORDER REGARDING THE DEPOSITION OF CHANDLER GIVENS
CV 11-0043-RS
sf-3282106
1
Defendant Stonebridge Life Insurance Company (“Stonebridge”), Trifecta Marketing
2
Group LLC (“Trifecta” and collectively with Stonebridge, “Defendants”) and Plaintiff Jessica
3
Lee (collectively with Defendants, the “parties”), by and through their respective counsel of
4
record, hereby enter into the following stipulation:
5
WHEREAS on October 18, 2012, Plaintiff filed the October 18, 2012 Declaration of
6
Chandler R. Givens in Support of Plaintiff’s Reply in Support of Motion for Class Certification
7
(“Givens Declaration”);
8
9
10
11
WHEREAS the Givens Declaration contains certain factual assertions concerning an
alleged text message he received from Plaintiff;
WHEREAS Stonebridge served a subpoena on Mr. Givens on April 17, 2013, calling for
him to appear for deposition on May 8, 2013;
12
WHEREAS Stonebridge intends to depose Mr. Givens concerning, among other things,
13
the contents of the Givens Declaration and any testimony he might offer concerning attempts to
14
call the 877-711-5429 phone number shown in Exhibit 1 to the Givens Declaration (the “877
15
Number”) and the results of any such calls;
16
17
WHEREAS Mr. Givens is an attorney at the law firm of Edelson LLC (“Edelson”),
Plaintiff’s counsel of record in this action;
18
WHEREAS Mr. Givens served objections to the subpoena served on him in this case;
19
WHEREAS the parties agree that it would be more efficient to stipulate to certain
20
evidentiary limitations rather than incur the time and expense of deposing Mr. Givens.
21
THEREFORE, the parties agree and stipulate as follows:
22
1.
23
24
25
26
Stonebridge agrees to withdraw the April 17, 2013 subpoena served on Mr. Givens
in this action;
2.
Defendants will not re-notice the deposition of Mr. Givens nor notice the
deposition of any other current or former Edelson attorneys, employees, or representatives;
3.
Plaintiff agrees that she will not offer any evidence in this action concerning any
27
phone calls made to the 877 Number by any current or former Edelson attorneys, employees, or
28
representatives, including but not limited to the contents of any conversations with persons who
[PROPOSED] STIPULATED ORDER REGARDING THE DEPOSITION OF CHANDLER GIVENS
CV 11-0043-RS
sf-3282106
1
1
2
may have answered such calls;
4.
Plaintiff further agrees that no Edelson attorneys, employees, or representatives
3
will offer any other oral or written testimony in this action, except for the Givens Declaration and
4
attorney declarations concerning matters that have occurred after January 4, 2011 (e.g.,
5
authentication of documents). Except as set forth in paragraph 5 below, no former or current
6
Edelson attorney, employee, or representative will testify at any trial in this matter.
7
5.
If a Defendant intends to present evidence at trial that refutes the contents of the
8
Givens Declaration, it will promptly notify Plaintiff of such intent. If a Defendant provides such
9
notice, Plaintiff may call Mr. Givens as a trial witness, but only if Plaintiff makes Mr. Givens
10
available for deposition within fourteen days of Defendant’s notice of intent to present the
11
refuting evidence at trial. If Mr. Givens’s deposition cannot be completed before fact discovery
12
has closed, Plaintiff agrees to join in a request to reopen fact discovery for the limited purpose of
13
deposing Mr. Givens regarding the matters expressed in the Givens Declaration. If called as a
14
witness at trial pursuant to the provisions of this paragraph, Mr. Givens’s testimony will be
15
limited to the matters expressed in the Givens Declaration.
16
IT IS SO STIPULATED
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] STIPULATED ORDER REGARDING THE DEPOSITION OF CHANDLER GIVENS
CV 11-0043-RS
sf-3282106
2
1
Dated: May 13, 2013
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
2
3
By:
4
5
6
Dated: May 13, 2013
7
/s/ Tiffany Cheung
TIFFANY CHEUNG
Attorneys for Defendant
STONEBRIDGE LIFE INSURANCE
COMPANY
LAW OFFICES OF ALEXANDER E.
SKLAVOS, PC
8
By:
9
10
11
12
Dated: May 13, 2013
/s/ Alex Sklavos
ALEX SKLAVOS
Attorneys for Defendant
TRIFECTA MARKETING GROUP
LLC
EDELSON LLC
13
14
15
16
By:
/s/ John Ochoa
JOHN OCHOA
Attorneys for Plaintiff
JESSICA LEE and the class
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] STIPULATED ORDER REGARDING THE DEPOSITION OF CHANDLER GIVENS
CV 11-0043-RS
sf-3282106
3
1
ATTESTATION OF FILER
I, Tiffany Cheung, hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been
2
3
obtained from each of the other signatories. See L.R. 5-1(i)(3).
4
Dated: May 13, 2013
5
6
By:
/s/ Tiffany Cheung
TIFFANY CHEUNG
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
7
8
9
10
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED
11
12
13
14
Dated:
5/14/13
Hon. Richard Seeborg
United States District Judge
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] STIPULATED ORDER REGARDING THE DEPOSITION OF CHANDLER GIVENS
CV 11-0043-RS
sf-3282106
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?