Lee v. Stonebridge Life Insurance Company
Filing
155
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO FURTHER STAY DEADLINES. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 2/5/14. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/5/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
DAN MARMALEFSKY (CA SBN 95477)
dmarmalefsky@mofo.com
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
707 Wilshire Boulevard
Los Angeles, California 90017-3543
Telephone: 213.892.5200
Facsimile: 213.892.5454
TIFFANY CHEUNG (CA SBN 211497)
TCheung@mofo.com
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
425 Market Street
San Francisco, California 94105-2482
Telephone: 415.268.7000
Facsimile: 415.268.7522
Attorneys for Defendant
STONEBRIDGE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
10
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
14
15
JESSICA LEE, individually and on behalf of a
class of similarly situated individuals,
16
Plaintiff,
17
Case No.
CV 11-0043-RS
STIPULATION AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER TO
FURTHER STAY DEADLINES
v.
Judge:
18
19
20
21
STONEBRIDGE LIFE INSURANCE
COMPANY, a Vermont corporation, and
TRIFECTA MARKETING GROUP LLC, a
Florida limited liability company,
Hon. Richard Seeborg
Action Filed:
Defendants.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO FURTHER STAY DEADLINES
CV 11-0043-RS
sf-3380165
Jan. 4, 2011
1
Plaintiff Jessica Lee, Defendant Stonebridge Life Insurance Company (“Stonebridge”),
2
and Defendant Trifecta Marketing Group, LLC (“Trifecta”) (collectively the “Parties”), by and
3
through their respective counsel of record, hereby enter into the following stipulation:
4
5
6
WHEREAS, the Parties have reached a class action settlement in principle that would
resolve all of the claims of Plaintiff and the Class against both Stonebridge and Trifecta;
WHEREAS, the Court has approved stipulations between the Parties that stayed all
7
activity in this Action, including all hearings and discovery and motion deadlines, for a total
8
period of approximately 11 weeks to allow the Parties to work on a class action settlement
9
agreement and submit it to the Court for preliminary approval (Docket No. 149);
10
11
12
WHEREAS, the Parties agreed to submit a joint status report to the Court upon the
expiration of current stay to inform the Court of the status of the settlement;
WHEREAS, the Parties have been diligently preparing and exchanging drafts of the class
13
action settlement agreement and related documents, but seek a brief 9-day extension of the
14
current stay, through February 13, 2014, to work on finalizing the agreement;
15
WHEREAS, the Parties believe a further stay of all case deadlines is warranted to avoid
16
unnecessary litigation expenses and to conserve the resources of both the Parties and the Court;
17
THEREFORE, subject to the approval of the Court, the Parties agree and stipulate that
18
this Action, including all hearings and discovery and motion deadlines, shall remain stayed
19
through February 13, 2014. The Parties agree to submit a joint status report on the day that this
20
stay is scheduled to expire to inform the Court of the status of the settlement, unless Plaintiff has
21
moved for preliminary approval of the class action settlement agreement on or before such time.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO FURTHER STAY DEADLINES
CV 11-0043-RS
sf-3380165
1
1
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
2
3
Dated: February 4, 2014
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
4
5
By:
6
Attorneys for Defendant
STONEBRIDGE LIFE INSURANCE
COMPANY
7
8
/s/ Tiffany Cheung
TIFFANY CHEUNG
Dated: February 4, 2014
EDELSON P.C.
9
10
11
By:
/s/ Ryan D. Andrews
RYAN D. ANDREWS
12
Attorneys for Plaintiff
JESSICA LEE and the class
13
14
15
Dated: February 4, 2014
LAW OFFFICES OF ALEXANDER
SKLAVOS
16
17
By:
18
/s/ Alexander E. Sklavos
ALEXANDER E. SKLAVOS
Attorney for Defendant
TRIFECTA MARKETING GROUP,
LLC
19
20
21
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED
22
23
24
25
Dated: 2/5/14
Hon. Richard Seeborg
United States District Judge
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO FURTHER STAY DEADLINES
CV 11-0043-RS
sf-3380165
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?