Lee v. Stonebridge Life Insurance Company
Filing
30
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO RESET SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE DATE. Settlement Conference re-set for 8/31/2011 09:30 AM in Courtroom G, 15th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 6/7/11. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/7/2011)
Case3:11-cv-00043-RS Document29
Filed06/06/11 Page1 of 3
1 DAN MARMALEFSKY (CA SBN 95477)
DMarmalefsky@mofo.com
2 TIFFANY CHEUNG (CA SBN 211497)
TCheung@mofo.com
3 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
4 555 West Fifth Street
Los Angeles, California 90013-1024
5 Telephone: 213.892.5200
Facsimile: 213.892.5454
6
Attorneys for Defendant
7 STONEBRIDGE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
8
9
10
11
12
Sean Reis (SBN 184044)
sreis@edelson.com
Edelson McGuire, LLP
30021 Tomas Street, Suite 300
Rancho Santa Margarita, California 92688
Tel: 949.459.2124
Fax: 949.459.2123
13 Michael J. McMorrow
mjmcmorrow@edelson.com
14 Ryan D. Andrews
randrews@edelson.com
15 Edelson McGuire, LLC
16 350 North LaSalle, Suite 1300
Chicago, Illinois 60654
17 Tel: 312.589.6370
Fax: 312.589.6378
18
19
Attorneys for Plaintiff
JESSICA LEE
20
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
21
22 JESSICA LEE, individually and on behalf of a
23 class of similarly situated individuals,
Plaintiff,
24
25
v.
26 STONEBRIDGE LIFE INSURANCE
27
COMPANY, a Vermont corporation,
Case No. CV 11-0043-RS
STIPULATION TO RESET
SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE DATE
Judge: Hon. Richard Seeborg
Magistrate: Hon. Joseph C. Spero
Defendant.
28
STIPULATION
CV-11-00043-RS
Case3:11-cv-00043-RS Document29
1
Filed06/06/11 Page2 of 3
Pursuant to Local Rule 6-2, Plaintiff Jessica Lee, individually and on behalf of a class of
2 similarly situated individuals (“Plaintiff”), and Defendant Stonebridge Life Insurance Company
3 (“Defendant”) (collectively referred to herein as the “Parties”), by and through their respective
4 counsel of record, hereby stipulate to move the date currently set for the settlement conference in
5 this case as set forth below:
6
WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed the Complaint in this case on January 4, 2011; and
7
WHEREAS, the Parties agreed to participate in, and the Court ordered, a settlement
8 conference in front of Hon. Joseph C. Spero, currently set for June 14, 2011; and
9
WHEREAS, the Parties agree that the presence of certain non-parties is essential for a
10 productive settlement conference; and
11
WHEREAS, additional time is required to confirm the availability of these non-parties for
12 the settlement conference; and
13
WHEREAS, this is the Parties’ first request to continue the date of the settlement
14 conference; and
15
WHEREAS, the stipulated continuance of the settlement conference will not alter the date of
16 any other deadlines in the schedule for the case; and
17
WHEREAS, the Parties have informed the Court of their desire to reset the date of the
18 settlement conference, and the Court has indicated that August 31, 2011 is an available date.
19
Pursuant to L.R. 6-2, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the Parties, through
20 their counsel, that, with the Court’s agreement, the settlement conference be reset from June 14,
21 2011 to August 31, 2011.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1STIPULATION
CV-11-00043-RS
Case3:11-cv-00043-RS Document29
Filed06/06/11 Page3 of 3
1
IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.
2
3 Dated: June 6, 2011
4
EDELSON MCGUIRE, LLP
5
By
6
/s/ Sean Reis
SEAN REIS
Attorney for
Plaintiff JESSICA LEE
7
8 Dated: June 6, 2011
9
MORRISON & FOERSTER, LLP
10
By
11
12
13
/s/ Tiffany Cheung
TIFFANY CHEUNG
Attorney for
Defendant STONEBRIDGE LIFE INSURANCE
COMPANY
14
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
UNIT
ED
17
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
S
06/07
16 DATED: __________, 2011
18
19
R NIA
_____________________________________
JOSEPH C. SPERO
NO
UNITED STATESoseph C. Spero
MAGISTRATE JUDGE
J
ER
H
21
22
FO
Judge
LI
RT
20
A
15
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2STIPULATION
CV-11-00043-RS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?