Engel v. Washington Mutual Bank FA et al

Filing 5

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER re 4 Stipulation filed by California Reconveyance Company. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 2/25/11. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/25/2011)

Engel v. Washington Mutual Bank FA et al

Doc. 5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

ERIK J. OLSON (BAR NO. 175815) [e-mail] BRIAN L. LEVINE (BAR NO. 246726) [e-mail] MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 755 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, California 94304-1018 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 650.494.0792 Attorneys for Defendant CALIFORNIA RECONVEYANCE COMPANY

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION DIANA ENGEL, an individual, Case No. 3:11-cv-00055-EMC

12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Defendants. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff DIANA ENGEL ("Plaintiff") and Defendant CALIFORNIA RECONVEYANCE COMPANY ("Defendant"), through their respective undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate pursuant to Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12 as follows: WHEREAS, in addition to filing this lawsuit, Plaintiff has sought specific relief from Defendants which may moot this lawsuit; and 1
STIPULATION EXTENDING DATES
Dockets.Justia.com

STIPULATION EXTENDING DATES; [PROPOSED] ORDER

WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, FA., a business entity, form unknown; NATIONAL CITY BANK, a business entity, form unknown; ALLIANCE TITLE COMPANY, a business entity, form unknown; UNITED TITLE AND SETTLEMENT, a business entity, form unknown; CALIFORNIA RECONVEYANCE COMPANY, a business entity, form unknown; MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC., a business entity, form unknown; and DOES 1-100 inclusive,

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

WHEREAS, Defendant believes that it is likely that a decision will be made regarding said relief and communicated to Plaintiff within the near future; IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED THAT: 1. Plaintiff and Defendant stipulate and agree that the date for all Defendants to

respond to Plaintiff's complaint will be extended until May 10, 2011. This is the Defendants' first extension and is without prejudice to a request to any further extension if needed. 2. Defendant stipulates and agrees that it will not sell Plaintiff's property located at

2952 Somerset Avenue, Castro Valley, California, before the Court has issued a ruling on its Motion to Dismiss. Dated: February 24, 2011 JOSEPH A. LEPERA LEPERA & ASSOCIATES, PC

By: /s/ Joseph A. Lepera JOSEPH A. LEPERA Attorneys for Plaintiff DIANA ENGEL Dated: February 24, 2011 ERIK J. OLSON BRIAN L. LEVINE MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

By: /s/ Brian L. Levine BRIAN L. LEVINE Attorneys for Defendant CALIFORNIA RECONVEYANCE COMPANY I, Brian L. Levine, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this Stipulation Extending Dates; [Proposed] Order. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Joseph A. Lepera has concurred in this filing. Dated: February 24, 2011 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP By: /s/ Brian L. Levine BRIAN L. LEVINE Attorneys for Defendant

25 26 27 28 2
STIPULATION EXTENDING DATES

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated:

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 2/25 , 2011 By:

D Magistrate Judge Edward M. Chen RDERE O IT IS S O
. Chen

UNIT ED

S

S DISTRICT TE C TA

ER

N

F D IS T IC T O R

3
STIPULATION EXTENDING DATES

A

C

LI

FO

J

ward M udge Ed

R NIA

RT U O

NO

RT

H