Engel v. Washington Mutual Bank FA et al

Filing 8

STIPULATION AND ORDER RESETTING CMC re 7 Stipulation filed by California Reconveyance Company. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 4/11/11. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/11/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 ERIK J. OLSON (BAR NO. 175815) EJOlson@mofo.com BRIAN L. LEVINE (BAR NO. 246726) BLevine@mofo.com MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 755 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, California 94304-1018 Telephone: 650.813.5600 Facsimile: 650.494.0792 Attorneys for Defendant CALIFORNIA RECONVEYANCE COMPANY 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 DIANA ENGEL, an individual, Case No. 3:11-cv-00055-EMC 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 15 16 17 18 19 WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, FA., a business entity, form unknown; NATIONAL CITY BANK, a business entity, form unknown; ALLIANCE TITLE COMPANY, a business entity, form unknown; UNITED TITLE AND SETTLEMENT, a business entity, form unknown; CALIFORNIA RECONVEYANCE COMPANY, a business entity, form unknown; MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC., a business entity, form unknown; and DOES 1-100 inclusive, STIPULATION CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER 20 Defendants. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 pa-1455737 1 STIPULATION EXTENDING DATES 1 Plaintiff DIANA ENGEL (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant CALIFORNIA RECONVEYANCE 2 COMPANY (“Defendant”), through their respective undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate 3 pursuant to Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12 as follows: 4 5 6 7 WHEREAS, in addition to filing this lawsuit, Plaintiff has sought specific relief from Defendants which may moot this lawsuit; and WHEREAS, Defendant believes that it is likely that a decision will be made regarding said relief and communicated to Plaintiff within the near future; 8 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED THAT: 9 1. 10 11 12 13 The date for the Initial Case Management Conference shall be continued from 27 April 20, 2011 to July 20, 2011, or such date thereafter as is convenient for the Court. 2. Defendants shall not be required to respond to the complaint until 30 days following the Case Management Conference. 3. The Parties shall not be required to make initial disclosures pursuant to Federal 14 Rule of Civil Procedure 26 or otherwise engage of discovery until 30 days following the Case 15 Management Conference. 16 17 Dated: April 5, 2011 JOSEPH A. LEPERA LEPERA & ASSOCIATES, PC 18 19 By: 20 21 22 Dated: April 5, 2011 23 /s/Joseph A. Lepera JOSEPH A. LEPERA Attorneys for Plaintiff DIANA ENGEL ERIK J. OLSON BRIAN L. LEVINE MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 24 25 By: 26 /s/Brian L. Levine BRIAN L. LEVINE Attorneys for Defendant CALIFORNIA RECONVEYANCE COMPANY 27 28 pa-1455737 2 STIPULATION EXTENDING DATES 1 2 I, Brian L. Levine, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this STIPULATION CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Joseph A. Lepera has concurred in this filing. 3 Dated: April 5, 2011 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 4 By: 5 6 /s/ Brian L. Levine BRIAN L. LEVINE Attorneys for Defendant 7 8 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. By: 13 S DISTRICT TE C TA RED D ODIFIE Magistrate S SO ORDE M. Chen Judge Edward 14 IT I AS M NO 15 RT ER 17 A N D IS T IC T R 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 pa-1455737 n M. Che H 16 dward Judge E R NIA 12 UNIT ED S , 2011 RT U O 11 4/11 Dated: FO 10 LI 9 3 STIPULATION EXTENDING DATES OF C

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?