Woodson v. City and County of San Francisco et al
Filing
61
AMENDED ORDER GRANTING REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION OF NOVEMBER 28, 2011 ORDER AND ENTERING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE(Correcting filing date reflected on previously filed order). Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on January 27, 2012. (jcslc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/27/2012)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
KEVIN WOODSON,
8
9
Plaintiff(s),
v.
AMENDED ORDER GRANTING
REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION
OF NOVEMBER 28, 2011 ORDER AND
ENTERING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
CITY & COUNTY OF SF, ET AL.,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
Case No. C-11-00057 JCS
Defendant(s).
___________________________________/
12
13
On November 28, 2011, the Court denied Plaintiff’s Application for Order To Show Cause;
14
Award of Attorneys’ Fees; and Other Appropriate Relief [Docket No. 57]. Subsequently, Plaintiff
15
filed a letter requesting that the Court reconsider its decision, contending that an Order to Show
16
Cause is appropriate because non-party Shamica D.D. Simpson Sr. refused to comply with the
17
Court’s subpoena requiring that she appear for deposition and therefore should be liable for fees and
18
costs incurred regardless of whether the action was dismissed. Upon reconsideration, the Court
19
agrees. Therefore, non-party Shamica D.D. Simpson Sr. shall appear and show cause why she
20
should not be held liable for attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in connection with her failure to
21
comply with the subpoena issued by the Court in this action. A show cause hearing is set for Friday,
22
February 10, 2012 at 1:30 p.m. in Courtroom G, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, CA. Ms.
23
Simpson may file a written response to this Order no later than Friday, February 3, 2012.
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
26
27
28
Dated: January 27, 2012
__________________________
JOSEPH C. SPERO
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?