Costco Wholesale Corp. v. Au Optronics Corp. et al

Filing 108

ORDER Re: extension of time to answer (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/6/2012)

9

ER

H

8

R NIA
FO

Attorneys for Defendants
HITACHI, LTD., HITACHI DISPLAYS, LTD.,
HITACHI ELECTRONIC DEVICES (USA), INC.

Judge S

RT

7

ston

usan Ill

NO

6

LI

5

D

RDERE

OO
IT IS S

A

4

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

RT
U
O

3

4492

S

2

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
KENT M. ROGER, State Bar No. 95987
HERMAN J. HOYING, State Bar No. 257495
S. JESSICA OURK, State Bar No. 275658
One Market, Spear Street Tower
San Francisco, CA 94105-1126
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

UNIT
ED

1

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12

C

(SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION)

13
14

This Document Relates to:
Individual Case No. 3:11-cv-00058-SI

MDL No. 1827

15
16

COSTCO WHOLESALE
CORPORATION,

17
18
19

Master File No. 3:07-md-1827

Plaintiff,
v.
AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, et al.,

STIPULATION PURSUANT TO CIVIL
LOCAL RULE 6-1(a) FOR EXTENSION OF
TIME TO ANSWER COSTCO’S SECOND
AMENDED COMPLAINT
Honorable Susan Illston

20
Defendants.

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

CASE NO. 3:11-CV-00058 SI; MDL NO. 1827
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

M ORGAN , L EWIS &
B OCKIUS LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
S A N F R A N CIS CO

DB2/ 22883113.2

1
2
3

Plaintiff and Defendants Hitachi, Ltd., Hitachi Displays, Ltd. and Hitachi Electronic
Devices (USA), Inc. (collectively, the “Hitachi Defendants”), through the undersigned counsel,
hereby agree and enter into the following Stipulation to extend the deadline for the Hitachi

4
Defendants to answer Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint and Jury Demand (“Second
5
6

Amended Complaint”).
WHEREAS plaintiff Costco filed its Second Amended Complaint on December 23, 2011;

7
8
9
10
11

and
WHEREAS the Hitachi Defendants need additional time to answer the Second Amended
Complaint due to the recent holidays.
THEREFORE, Plaintiff and the Hitachi Defendants hereby agree and stipulate, pursuant

12
13
14
15
16

to Rule 6-1(a) of the Civil Local Rules:
1.

The Hitachi Defendants’ deadline to answer the Second Amended Complaint shall

be January 13, 2011.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.

17
18

Respectfully submitted,
Dated: January 6, 2012

19

By: /s/ David J. Burman
David J. Burman (admitted pro hac vice)
Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 2400
San Francisco, CA 94111
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]

20
21
22
23

Attorneys for Plaintiff Costco Wholesale Corporation
24
25
26
27
28

M ORGAN , L EWIS &
B OCKIUS LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW

-2-

S A N F R A N CIS CO

DB2/ 22883113.2

CASE NO. 3:11-CV-00058 SI; MDL NO. 1827
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

1

MORGAN LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP

2

By: /s/ Kent M. Roger
Kent M. Roger (SBN 95987)
Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP
One Market, Spear Street Tower
San Francisco, CA 94105
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]

3
4
5
6

Attorneys for Defendants Hitachi, Ltd., Hitachi Displays,
Ltd., and Hitachi Electronic Devices (USA), Inc.

7
8

FILER’S ATTESTATION

9
10
11
12

I, Kent M. Roger, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being used to file
this Stipulation. In compliance with General Order 45.X.B, I hereby attest that David J.
Burman concurs in this filing.
/s/ Kent M. Roger
Kent M. Roger

13
14

Attorneys for Defendants Hitachi, Ltd., Hitachi Displays,
Ltd., and Hitachi Electronic Devices (USA), Inc.

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

M ORGAN , L EWIS &
B OCKIUS LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW

-3-

S A N F R A N CIS CO

DB2/ 22883113.2

CASE NO. 3:11-CV-00058 SI; MDL NO. 1827
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME