Costco Wholesale Corp. v. Au Optronics Corp. et al

Filing 60

Order Extending Time to Respond to Amended Complaint by Epson Electronics America, Inc., Epson Imaging Devices Corporation. (Freccero, Stephen) (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/19/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

MELVIN R. GOLDMAN (CA SBN 34097)
[e-mail]
STEPHEN P. FRECCERO (CA SBN 131093)
[e-mail]
DEREK F. FORAN (CA SBN 224569)
[e-mail]
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
425 Market Street
San Francisco, California 94105-2482
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 415.268.7522
Attorneys for Defendants
EPSON IMAGING DEVICES CORPORATION AND
EPSON ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.

9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
12
13
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION,

Master File No.3:07-md-1827-SI

14
Plaintiff,

Case No.

3:11-cv-0058-SI

15
v.
16
AU OPTRONICS CORP., et al.,
17
Defendants.
18

STIPULATION AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER
EXTENDING TIME TO
RESPOND TO AMENDED
COMPLAINT

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE TIME TO RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT
3:11-cv-0058-SI
sf-3058373

1

1

The undersigned counsel hereby respectfully request an extension of the deadline for

2

Defendants Epson Imaging Devices Corporation and Epson Electronics America, Inc.

3

(collectively, the “Epson Defendants”), to respond to the Amended Complaint filed by Plaintiff

4

Costco Wholesale Corporation on September 29, 2011, in the above-captioned litigation (the

5

“Amended Complaint”).

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

WHEREAS the Epson Defendants, jointly with other Defendants in this action, filed a
motion to compel arbitration on July 25, 2011;
WHEREAS the Court entered an order granting in part and denying in part Defendants’
joint motion to compel arbitration on August 29, 2011;
WHEREAS the Epson Defendants’ deadline to answer the Amended Complaint is
October 17, 2011;
WHEREAS the parties desire additional time to evaluate the applicability of the August
29, 2011 order on Plaintiff’s claims against the Epson Defendants; and
WHEREAS extending the time for the Epson Defendants to answer the Amended

15

Complaint would not alter the date of any other event or deadline already fixed by the Court;.

16

THEREFORE, Plaintiff Costco Wholesale Corporation and the Epson Defendants, by

17
18
19

their respective counsel, stipulate and agree as follows:
The Epson Defendants will have until October 31, 2011 to answer the Amended
Complaint.

20

//

21

//

22

//

23

//

24

//

25

//

26

//

27

//

28

//
STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE TIME TO RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT
3:11-cv-0058-SI
sf-3058373

2

1

Dated: October 13, 2011

Respectfully submitted,

2

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

3

By:

4
5
6
7
8
9

/s/ Stephen P. Freccero
STEPHEN P. FRECCERO

Melvin R. Goldman
Stephen P. Freccero
Derek F. Foran
Morrison & Foerster LLP
425 Market Street
San Francisco, CA 94105-2482
Attorneys for Defendants Epson Imaging
Devices Corporation and Epson Electronics
America, Inc.

10

PERKINS COIE LLP

11

By:

12
13
14
15
16
17
18

/s/ David J. Burman
DAVID J. BURMAN

David J. Burman
Cori G. Moore
Troy P. Sauro
Euphemia N. Thomopulos
Noah G. Purcell
Perkins Coie LLP
Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 2400
San Francisco, CA 94111
Attorneys for Plaintiff Costco Wholesale
Corporation

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE TIME TO RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT
3:11-cv-0058-SI
sf-3058373

3

1
2

Order

3

Having considered the foregoing stipulation, and for good cause appearing,

4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

5
6
7

10/14
Dated: ______________, 2011

_____________________________
The Honorable Susan Illston
United States District Judge

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE TIME TO RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT
3:11-cv-0058-SI
sf-3058373

4