Costco Wholesale Corp. v. Au Optronics Corp. et al

Filing 92

ORDER Re: Answer Deadline (#4298) (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/15/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

HUGH F. BANGASSER (PRO HAC VICE)
RAMONA M. EMERSON (PRO HAC VICE)
CHRISTOPHER M. WYANT (PRO HAC VICE)
K&L GATES LLP
925 Fourth Avenue, Suite 2900
Seattle, WA 98104-1158
Phone: [phone]
Fax:
[phone]
JEFFREY L. BORNSTEIN, State Bar No. #99358
K&L Gates LLP
Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 1200
San Francisco, CA 94111
Phone: [phone]
Fax:
[phone]
Attorneys for Defendants
HANNSTAR DISPLAY CORPORATION

10
11

[Additional moving parties and counsel
listed on signature pages]

12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

13

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

14
IN RE: TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL)
ANTITRUST LITIGATION

Case No. 3:07-md-1827-SI
MDL No. 1827

17

This Document Relates to:

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER RE: ANSWER DEADLINE

18

Case No. 3:11-cv-00058-SI

15
16

Honorable Susan Illston

19
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION,
20
Plaintiff,
21
22
23
24

v.
AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, et al.,
Defendants.

25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER
RE: ANSWER DEADLINE
Case No. 3:11-cv-00058-SI; 3:07-md-1827-SI

1

Plaintiffs and the Stipulating Defendants, through the undersigned counsel, request that

2

the Court enter the following order to extend the deadline for the Stipulating Defendants to

3

answer Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint and Jury Demand (“Amended Complaint”).

4
5
6
7

WHEREAS the Court granted Defendants’ motion to dismiss the Amended Complaint,
in part, on November 28, 2011; and
WHEREAS the Stipulating Defendants desire a reasonable amount of time to answer the
Amended Complaint;

8

THEREFORE, Plaintiff and the Stipulating Defendants hereby agree:

9

1.

10
11

The Stipulating Defendants’ deadline to answer the Amended Complaint shall be

December 30, 2011.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.

12
13

Respectfully submitted,

17

By: /s/ Cori G. Moore
David J. Burman, (pro hac vice)
Cori G. Moore, (pro hac vice)
PERKINS COIE, LLP
Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 2400
San Francisco, CA 94111
[phone] (Phone)
[phone] (Facsimile)

18

Attorneys for Plaintiff Costco Wholesale Corporation

19

By: /s/ Christopher M. Wyant
Hugh F. Bangasser (pro hac vice)
Ramona M. Emerson (pro hac vice)
Christopher M. Wyant (pro hac vice)
K&L GATES LLP
925 Fourth Avenue, Suite 2900
Seattle, WA 98004-1158
[phone] (Phone)
[phone] (Facsimile)
[e-mail]
Jeffrey L. Bornstein, (CA SBN 99358)
K&L GATES LLP
55 Second Street, Suite 1700
San Francisco, CA, 94105-3493
Phone: [phone]
Fax:
[phone]
Attorneys for Defendant HannStar Display
Corporation
STIPULATION AND ORDER
1

14
15
16

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Dated: December 7, 2011

RE: ANSWER DEADLINE
Case No. 3:11-cv-00058-SI; 3:07-md-1827-SI

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

By: /s/ Christopher A. Nedeau
Christopher A. Nedeau (SBN 81297)
Carl L. Blumenstein (SBN 124158)
Allison Dibley (SBN 213104)
NOSSAMAN LLP
50 California Street, 34th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
[phone] (Phone)
[phone] (Facsimile)
[e-mail]
Attorneys for AU Optronics Corporation and AU
Optronics Corporation America
By: /s/ Harrison J. Frahn IV
Harrison J. Frahn IV
SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP
2550 Hanover Street
Palo Alto, CA 94304
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendants Chimei Innolux
Corporation (f/k/a Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corp.),
Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA, Inc., and CMO Japan
Co., Ltd.

15
16
17
18
19
20
21

By: /s/ Kent M. Roger
Kent M. Roger (State Bar No. 95987)
Michelle Kim-Szrom (State Bar No. 252901)
MORGAN LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
One Market, Spear Street Tower
San Francisco, CA 94105-1126
[phone] (Phone)
[phone] (Facsimile)
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Hitachi, Ltd., Hitachi Displays, Ltd.
and Hitachi Electronic Devices (USA), Inc.

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2

STIPULATION AND ORDER
RE: ANSWER DEADLINE
Case No. 3:11-cv-00058-SI; 3:07-md-1827-SI

1
By: /s/ Holly House
Holly House (SBN 136045)
Kevin C. McCann (SBN 120874)
PAUL HASTINGS LLP
55 Second Street, Twenty-Fourth Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105-3441
[phone] / [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

2
3
4
5
6
7

Attorneys for LG Display Co., Ltd., and LG Display
America, Inc.

8
9

By: /s/ Rachel S. Brass
Rachel S. Brass (State Bar No. 219301)
GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
555 Mission Street
Suite 3000
San Francisco, California 94105-2933
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]

10
11
12
13
14

Attorneys for Chunghwa Picture Tubes, Ltd. and
Tatung Co. of America, Inc.

15
16
17
Pursuant to General Order 45, Part X-B, the filer attests that concurrence in the
18
filing of this document has been obtained from the above-referenced counsel.
19
20

Having considered the foregoing stipulation, and good cause appearing,

21
IT IS SO ORDERED.
22
23
24
25

12/12/11
Date Entered

Honorable Judge Susan Illston

26
27
28
3

STIPULATION AND ORDER
RE: ANSWER DEADLINE
Case No. 3:11-cv-00058-SI; 3:07-md-1827-SI

1
2
3
4
5

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE BY E-MAIL
(Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 5(b))
I declare that I am employed with the law firm of K&L Gates, LLP, whose address is
925 4th Avenue, Suite 2900, Seattle, Washington 98104-1158. I am not a party to the case, and I
am over the age of eighteen years.
I further declare that on December 7, 2011, I served a copy of:

6
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE ANSWER DEADLINE
7
8
9
10

by electronically mailing a true and correct copy to all parties of record through the CM-ECF
system in accordance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 5(b).
I declare under penalty of perjury that the above is true and correct.
Executed at Seattle, Washington, this 7th day of December, 2011.

11
12
13

/s/ Christopher M. Wyant
Christopher M. Wyant

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4

STIPULATION AND ORDER
RE: ANSWER DEADLINE
Case No. 3:11-cv-00058-SI; 3:07-md-1827-SI