Bugari v. Napolitano

Filing 8

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO BE EXEMPT FROM FORMAL ADR PROCESS. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 03/16/11. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/17/2011)

Download PDF
Bugari v. Napolitano Doc. 8 1 MELINDA HAAG, CSBN 132612 United States Attorney 2 ILA C. DEISS, NY SBN 3052909 Assistant United States Attorney 3 450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055 San Francisco, California 94102 4 Telephone: (415) 436-7124 Fax: (415) 436-7169 5 Email: ila.deiss@usdoj.gov 6 TARA GARCIA Certified Student Attorney 7 Attorneys for Respondent 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 JOLLY BUGARI 12 Petitioner, 13 v. 14 JANET NAPOLITANO 15 Respondent. 16 17 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. C 11-0084 JCS PARTIES' JOINT REQUEST TO BE EXEMPT FROM FORMAL ADR PROCESS; AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Each of the undersigned certifies that he or she has read either the handbook entitled "Dispute 18 Resolution Procedures in the Northern District of California" or the specified portions of the ADR 19 Unit's Internet site <www.adr.cand.uscourts.gov>, discussed the available dispute resolution 20 options provided by the court and private entities, and considered whether this case might benefit 21 from any of them. 22 Here, the parties agree that referral to a formal ADR process will not be beneficial because this 23 action is limited to Petitioner's request that this Court review the denial of Petitioner's 24 naturalization application, as per 8 U.S.C. 1421(c). Given the substance of the action and the 25 lack of any potential middle ground, ADR will only serve to multiply the proceedings and 26 unnecessarily tax court resources. 27 Accordingly, pursuant to ADR L.R. 3-3(c), the parties request the case be removed from the 28 ADR Multi-Option Program and that they be excused from participating in the ADR phone Request for ADR Exemption C 11-0084 JCS Dockets.Justia.com 1 conference and any further formal ADR process. If any party subsequently determines that 2 submission to the formal ADR process would be beneficial to the efficient resolution of this 3 matter, the parties agree to submit to the Court's ADR program at that time. 4 Dated: March 14, 2011 5 6 7 8 9 Attorneys for Respondent 10 11 Dated: March 15, 2011 12 13 14 ORDER 15 Pursuant to stipulation and to ADR L. R. 3-3(c), the parties are hereby removed from the ADR 16 Multi-Option Program and are excused from participating in the ADR phone conference and any 17 further formal ADR process. Should any party subsequently determine that submission to the 18 formal ADR process would be beneficial to the efficient resolution of this matter, that party may 19 request placement in one of the Court's ADR programs at that time. 20 21 UNIT ED ISTRIC ES D TC AT T Respectfully submitted, MELINDA HAAG United States Attorney /s/ ILA C. DEISS Assistant United States Attorney _____________/s/_______________ ANOOP PRASAD Attorney for Petitioner 22 23 Dated: 03/16/11 24 25 26 27 28 Request for ADR Exemption C 11-0084 JCS ER N F D IS T IC T O R 2 A C LI FO ___________________________ JOSEPH C. SPERO United StatesJoMagistrate Judge Spero seph C. Judge S SO ORDERED. R NIA RT U O NO RT H

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?