Levi Strauss & Co v. Dolce & Gabbana S.r.l. et al

Filing 36

ORDER DISMISSING CASE with prejudice. Each party shall be bear its own costs and attorneys' fees.(tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/28/2011) Modified on 9/29/2011 (ysS, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP GREGORY S. GILCHRIST (Bar # 111536) GIA L. CINCONE (Bar # 141668) Two Embarcadero Center, 8th Floor San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 576-0200 Facsimile: (415) 576-0300 Email: ggilchrist@kilpatricktownsend.com, gcincone@kilpatricktownsend.com 5 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff LEVI STRAUSS & CO. 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LEVI STRAUSS & CO., 12 13 14 Case No. CV 11-00127 SI Plaintiff, STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE; [PROPOSED] ORDER v. DOLCE & GABBANA S.r.l. and DOLCE & GABBANA USA INC., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Stipulation of Dismissal; [Proposed] Order -1- Levi Strauss & Co. v. Dolce & Gabbana S.r.l., et al. Case No. CV 11-00127 SI 1 The parties, by their respective counsel and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 2 41(a)(1), stipulate that this action be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice. Each party shall bear its 3 own costs and attorneys’ fees. 4 5 DATED: September 26, 2011 Respectfully submitted, 6 By: /s/ Gia Cincone Gia Cincone 7 8 KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff LEVI STRAUSS & CO. 9 10 DATED: September 26, 2011 11 12 By: /s/ Mark Lerner Mark Lerner SATTERLEE STEPHENS BURKE & BURKE LLP Attorneys for Defendants DOLCE & GABBANA S.R.L. and DOLCE & GABBANA USA INC. 13 14 15 16 17 IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: ____________, 2011 9/27 18 ______________________________________________ Hon. Susan Illston United States District Judge 19 20 21 22 63667022 v1 23 24 25 26 27 28 Stipulation of Dismissal; [Proposed] Order -2- Levi Strauss & Co. v. Dolce & Gabbana S.r.l., et al. Case No. CV 11-00127 SI

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?