Levi Strauss & Co v. Dolce & Gabbana S.r.l. et al
Filing
36
ORDER DISMISSING CASE with prejudice. Each party shall be bear its own costs and attorneys' fees.(tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/28/2011) Modified on 9/29/2011 (ysS, COURT STAFF).
1
2
3
4
KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP
GREGORY S. GILCHRIST (Bar # 111536)
GIA L. CINCONE (Bar # 141668)
Two Embarcadero Center, 8th Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: (415) 576-0200
Facsimile: (415) 576-0300
Email: ggilchrist@kilpatricktownsend.com, gcincone@kilpatricktownsend.com
5
6
Attorneys for Plaintiff
LEVI STRAUSS & CO.
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
LEVI STRAUSS & CO.,
12
13
14
Case No. CV 11-00127 SI
Plaintiff,
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
WITH PREJUDICE; [PROPOSED]
ORDER
v.
DOLCE & GABBANA S.r.l. and DOLCE &
GABBANA USA INC.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Stipulation of Dismissal; [Proposed] Order
-1-
Levi Strauss & Co. v. Dolce & Gabbana S.r.l., et al.
Case No. CV 11-00127 SI
1
The parties, by their respective counsel and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
2
41(a)(1), stipulate that this action be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice. Each party shall bear its
3
own costs and attorneys’ fees.
4
5
DATED: September 26, 2011
Respectfully submitted,
6
By: /s/ Gia Cincone
Gia Cincone
7
8
KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP
Attorneys for Plaintiff
LEVI STRAUSS & CO.
9
10
DATED: September 26, 2011
11
12
By: /s/ Mark Lerner
Mark Lerner
SATTERLEE STEPHENS BURKE & BURKE LLP
Attorneys for Defendants
DOLCE & GABBANA S.R.L. and
DOLCE & GABBANA USA INC.
13
14
15
16
17
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: ____________, 2011
9/27
18
______________________________________________
Hon. Susan Illston
United States District Judge
19
20
21
22
63667022 v1
23
24
25
26
27
28
Stipulation of Dismissal; [Proposed] Order
-2-
Levi Strauss & Co. v. Dolce & Gabbana S.r.l., et al.
Case No. CV 11-00127 SI
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?