Evans v. Lee et al

Filing 58

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL re 57 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER for Dismissal of Entire Action filed by Janice Evans. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 5/16/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/16/2012)

1
2
3
4
5

K. Randolph Moore, SBN 106933
Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683
MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.
332 North Second Street
San Jose, California 95112
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Janice Evans

6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

JANICE EVANS,

17

) No: 3:11-CV-00132-EMC
)
) STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF
) ENTIRE ACTION; [PROPOSED] ORDER
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

18

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Janice Evans (“Plaintiff”) and

19

Defendant Huong T. Le dba Pete’s Stop aka Pete’s Stop & Mini Mart (“Defendant”), by and

20

through their respective counsel, that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2),

21

Defendant Huong T. Le dba Pete’s Stop aka Pete’s Stop & Mini Mart be dismissed with

22

prejudice from this action.

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

vs.

15

HUONG T. LEE dba PETE’S STOP aka
PETE’S STOP & MINI MART, et al.,

16

Defendants.

23

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED between Plaintiff and Defendant that this case has been

24

settled as between them and all issues and controversies have been resolved to their mutual

25

satisfaction. Plaintiff and Defendant request the Court to retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms

26

of their settlement agreement under the authority of Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of

27

America, 511 U.S. 375, 381-82 (1994).

28

///

Evans v. Lee, et al.
Stipulation for Dismissal; [Proposed] Order

Page 1

1

Date: May 15, 2012

MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.

2
3

/s/ Tanya E. Moore
Tanya E. Moore
Attorney for Plaintiff Janice Evans

4
5
6
7

Date: May 15, 2012

/s/ Mimi N. Trieu
Mimi N. Trieu
Attorney for Defendant Huong T. Le dba Pete’s
Stop aka Pete’s Stop & Mini Mart

8
9
10
11

ORDER

12
13

The parties having so stipulated,

14

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

15

1.

Plaintiff Janice Evans and Defendant Huong T. Le dba Pete’s Stop aka Pete’s

16

Stop & Mini Mart shall comply with the terms of the confidential Settlement Agreement and

17

Release in Full, the terms of which are incorporated herein by reference.
2.

18

By consent of Plaintiff Janice Evans and Defendant Huong T. Le dba Pete’s Stop

19

aka Pete’s Stop & Mini Mart, the Court shall retain jurisdiction in this matter for the purpose of

20

enforcing the terms of the settlement agreement.
3.

21

Except as provided for in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, Huong T. Le dba Pete’s Stop

aka Pete’s Stop & Mini Mart is dismissed with prejudice from this action.

23

IT IS SO ORDERED.

24

May 16, 2012

RT

H

ER

Evans v. Lee, et al.
Stipulation for Dismissal; [Proposed] Order

n

M. Che

LI

dward
Judge E

R NIA

O

FO

O
IT IS S

NO

28

______________________________________
United States District RED Judge
RDE Court

A

27

UNIT
ED

26

Dated:

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

RT
U
O

25

S

22

N

D IS T IC T
R

Page 2

OF

C