Securities And Exchange Commission v. Daifotis et al

Filing 87

ORDER PARTIALLY GRANTING STIPULATED REQUESTS (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/14/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, 12 13 14 15 No. C 11-00137 WHA ORDER PARTIALLY GRANTING STIPULATED REQUESTS v. KIMON DAIFOTIS and RANDALL MERK, Defendants. / 16 17 The stipulated request for an order enlarging time for defendants’ oppositions and 18 plaintiff’s reply on plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File First Amended Complaint and 19 consolidating hearing dates on pending motions is granted in part and denied in part as follows. 20 21 22 The request to enlarge time for defendants’ oppositions and plaintiff’s reply on plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File First Amended Complaint is DENIED AS MOOT. The request to consolidate hearing dates for defendants’ Motion for Certification Pursuant 23 to 28 U.S.C. 1292(b) and plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File First Amended Complaint is 24 GRANTED. Thus, the hearing for defendants’ Motion for Certification Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 25 1292(b) is hereby RESCHEDULED TO OCTOBER 6, 2011 AT 8 A.M. The defendants’ Motion for 26 27 28 1 Certification will be heard at the same time as plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File First Amended 2 Complaint. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 5 Dated: September 14, 2011. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 6 7 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?