Mahoney v. Donahoe et al
Filing
50
ORDER by Chief Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James granting 49 Stipulation and Protective Order (rmm2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/16/2012)
1
2
Shirley Mahoney
1 Elysian PL
Oakland, CA 94605
Phone Number (51 0-418-0330)
3
Shirley Mahoney, IN PRO PER
4
5
6
7
MELINDA IIAAG (CSBN 132612)
United States Attomey
ALEX G. TSE (CSBN 152348)
Chief, Civil Division
NEILL T. TSENG (CSBN 220348)
Assistant United States Attomey
8
9
10
450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055
San Francisco, Califomia 94102-3495
Telephone: (415) 436-7155
FAX: (415) 436-6927
neill. tseng@usdoj .gov
11
12
Attorneys for Defendant
P ATRlCK DONAHOE
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
SAN FRANCISCO DMSION
16
17
SHIRLEY MAHONEY,
)
18
Plainti±J:~
·~
19
20
)
v.
~
PATRICK DONAHOE, Postmaster General,)
United States Postal Service,
)
21
No. C 11-00177 MEJ
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
PROTECTIVE ORDER RE EEO
COMPLAINTS AND OTHER
CONFIDENTIAL INJ{ORMATION
WHICH MAY BE .PRODUCED BY
DEFENDANT
)
Defendant.
22
)
23
Subject to the approval of this Court, plaintiff Shirley Mahoney, pro se, and defendant
24
Patrick Donahoe, through his counsel of record in this action, hereby stipulate to the following
25
protective order as follows:
26
27
WHEREAS, plaintiff seeks the production of ce1iain documents relating to EEO
compl.aints brought against defendant and against ce1iain of defendant's employees;
28
STIP. & [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER RE EEO COMPLAINTS & OTHER CONFIDENTIAL
INFO. WHICH MAY BE PRODUCED BY DEF.
C 11-00177 ME.l
1
WHEREAS, defendant considers the requested documents to be protected by the Privacy
2
Act of 1974 (the '"Privacy Act"), 5 lJ.S.C. § 552a, which may not be disclosed except pursuant to
3
certain conditions, one of which is "pursuant to the order of a court of competent jurisdiction,"
4
5lJ.S.C. § 552a(b)(ll);
5
6
7
WHEREAS, in the course of this litigation, there may be other information that the
parties consider protected or confidential and desire to produce subject to a protective order;
WHEREAS, the parties agree that entry of the following protective order is necessary in
8
order to: (I) facilitate discovery of information without document by document controversy
9
concerning confidentiality; (2) protect employees or fonner employees of the United States
10
Postal Service from annoyance, embarrassment, oppression, or undue burden or expense
11
resulting from public disclosure or use for purposes other than tllis litigation of cont1dential
12
infonnation that the parties may disclose in discovery; and (3) avoid violation of the Privacy Act;
13
14
THEREFORE, the parties jointly request that the Court enter the following stipulated
protective orderpursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c).
15
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
All documents and electronically stored information produced by defendant in response
16
17
to discovery requests made lmder the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, or produced by defendant
18
pursuant to any initial or other disclosure requirement, which are designated in writing as being
19
"Produced Under Protective Order" (the "Protected Documents") shall be subject to the below-
20
numbered restrictions. The Protected Documents may include but are not limited to documents
21
contained within any EEO file, medical file, injury compensation file, or personnel file of any
22
person.
23
24
25
1..
The Protected Documents and the infom1ation contained therein shall be used
only for the purpose of this litigation and not for any otber purpose.
2.
Neither the Protected Documents nor the information contained therein shall be
26
disclosed to anyone other than (a) the parties; (b) the parties' attorneys of record, if any, and the
27
attorneys' staff; (c) actual or potential third-party witnesses; (d) outside experts or consultants
28
ST!P. & [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER RE EEO COMPLAINTS & OTHER CONFIDENTIAL
INFO. WHICH MAY BE PRODUCED BY DEF.
C 11-00177 MEJ
2
1
retained by any of the parties or their counsel for purposes of this litigation; (e) the Court in
2
further proceedings herein; (f) stenographic deposition reporters; and (g) other persons upon
3
whom the parties mutually agree in writing.
4
3.
There shall be no reproduction of the Protected Documents, except that, as
5
required by the litigation, copies, excerpts, or summaries may be shown to those authorized in
6
Paragraph 2.
7
4.
Except as otherwise provided in Paragraphs 2 and 3, all of the Protected
8
Documents shaH remain in the custody of the plaintiff or plaintiff's attomey of record, if any,
9
during the pendency of the litigation.
10
5.
Within 3 0 days after the final disposition of this action, plaintiff or plaintiffs
11
attorney of record, if any, shall return all of the Protected Documents, including copies, extracts
12
or summaries thereof: to defendant's counsel of record or destroy such materiaL "Final
13
disposition" shall be deemed to be the later of ( 1) dismissal of all claims and defenses in this
14
action, with or without prejudice; or (2) final judgment herein after the completion and
15
exhaustion of all appeals, rehearings, remands, trials, or reviews of this action, including the time
16
limits for filing any motions or applications for extension of time pursuant to applicable law.
17
Whether the Protected Documents are retmned or destroyed, plaintiff or plaintiff's attorney of
18
record, if any, must submit a written certification to defendant's counsel of record by the 30-day
19
deadline certifying that all of the Protected Documents were returned or destroyed.
20
Notwithstanding this provision, plaintiff or plaintiffs attorney of record, if any, may retain one
21
archival copy of all pleadings, motion papers, trial, deposition, and hearing transcripts, legal
22
memoranda, correspondence, deposition and trial exhibits, expert reports, attorney work product,
23
and consultant and expert \vork product, even if such copy contains any of the Protected
24
Documents. Any such archival copy that cont.1ins any of the Protected Documents remains
25
subject to this Protective Order as set forth in paragraph 6.
26
27
6.
Even after final disposition of this litigation, the confldentiality obligations
imposed by this Protective Order shall remain in effect unless and tmtil defendant agrees
28
STIP. & [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER RE EEO COMPLAINTS & OTHER CONFIDENTIAL
1NFO. WHICH MAY BE PRODUCED BY DEF.
C 11-001.77 MEJ
3
1
2
otherwise in writing or a Couti order othenvise directs.
7.
This Stipulation and Protective Order is without prejudice to the 1ight of any party
3
to seek modification of it from the Court. It shall remain in effect until such time as it is
4
modified, amended or rescinded by the Couti and shall survive termination of this action. The
5
Court shall have continuing jurisdiction to modify, amend, or rescind this Stipulation and
6
Protective Order notwithstanding the termination of this action.
7
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
8
9
10
By:
DATED:
11
12
MELINDA HAAG
United States Attorney
13
14
15
DATED:
toILt !o/1 (.,
16
By:
~~c:
NEILL T. TSENG
'(
Assistant Ui1ited States Attorney
Attorneys for Defendant
17
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
18
19
20
21
DATED:
October 16, 2012
HONORABLE MARIA~ELENA JAMES
UNITED STATES CHIEF MAGISTRATE JUDGE
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIP. & [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER RE EEO COMPLAINTS & OTHER CONFIDENTIAL
INFO. WHICH MAY BE PRODUCED BY DEF.
C ll-00177 MEJ
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?