Jenkins et al v. Mandelbaum et al

Filing 39

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER re 35 Stipulation, filed by 3EB Touring Inc, Stephan Jenkins Productions Inc, Third Eye Blind Inc, Stephan Jenkins. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 5/25/11. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/25/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

RICHARD J. IDELL, ESQ. (SBN 069033)
ORY SANDEL, ESQ. (SBN 233204)
IDELL & SEITEL LLP
465 California Street, Suite 300
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Counter-Defendants
STEPHAN JENKINS, THIRD EYE BLIND, INC.,
3EB TOURING, INC. and STEPHAN JENKINS
PRODUCTIONS, INC.

9
10
11
12
13

JAMES A. MURPHY, ESQ. (SBN 062223)
HARLAN B. WATKINS, ESQ. (SBN 176458)
MURPHY, PEARSON, BRADLEY & FEENEY
88 Kearny Street, 10th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94108-5530
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

14
15

Attorneys for Defendant and Cross-Claimant
HISCOCK & BARCLAY, LLP

16
17

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

18

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

19
20
21
22
23

Case No.: CV-11-0211 EMC

STEPHAN JENKINS, an individual; THIRD
EYE BLIND, INC., a California corporation;
3EB TOURING, INC., a California
corporation; and STEPHAN JENKINS
PRODUCTIONS, INC., a California
corporation,

STIPULATION FURTHER EXTENDING
TIME TO RESPOND TO COUNTERCLAIMANT HISCOCK & BARCLAY,
LLP’S COUNTERCLAIM
[N.D. CAL. CIV. L.R. 6-1(a)]

Plaintiffs,
24
25
26
27
28

[PROPOSED] ORDER

vs.

(E-filing)

THOMAS IRVING MANDELBAUM, an
individual; SELVERNE, MANDELBAUM &
MINTZ, LLP, a New York limited liability
partnership; HISCOCK & BARCLAY, LLP, a
New York limited liability partnership; and
DOES 1 through 500, inclusive,

Hon. Edward M. Chen, Presiding

STIPULATION FURTHER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO
COUNTER-CLAIMANT HISCOCK & BARCLAY, LLP’S COUNTERCLAIM

-1-

1

Defendants.

2
3

HISCOCK & BARCLAY, LLP, a New York
limited liability partnership,

4
5
6
7
8
9
10

Counter-Claimant,
vs.
STEPHAN JENKINS, an individual; THIRD
EYE BLIND, INC., a California corporation;
3EB TOURING, INC., a California
corporation; and STEPHAN JENKINS
PRODUCTIONS, INC., a California
corporation,
Counter-Defendants.

11

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1(a), IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by
12

Plaintiffs and Counter-Defendants STEPHAN JENKINS, an individual; THIRD EYE BLIND,
13

INC., a California corporation; 3EB TOURING, INC., a California corporation; and STEPHAN
14

JENKINS PRODUCTIONS, INC., a California corporation (collectively, “Plaintiffs” or
15

“Counter-Defendants”), on the one hand, and Defendants and Counter-Claimant HISCOCK &
16

BARCLAY, LLP, a New York limited liability partnership (“Defendant” or “Counter17

Claimant”), on the other hand, by and through their undersigned counsel, that Counter18

Defendants’ time to respond to Counter-Claimant’s Counterclaim (filed on January 21, 2011
19

[Docket No. 10]) is extended up to and including May 16, 2011. Counter-Defendants’ motion to
20

dismiss the Counterclaim was denied on April 22, 2011. This change will not alter the date of
21

any event or any deadline already fixed by Court order.
22

SO STIPULATED.
23

MURPHY, PEARSON, BRADLEY & FEENEY
24
25
26

Dated: May 12, 2011

By:

/s/
James Murphy
Attorneys for Defendant and Cross-Claimant
HISCOCK & BARCLAY, LLP

27
28

IDELL & SEITEL LLP

STIPULATION FURTHER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO
COUNTER-CLAIMANT HISCOCK & BARCLAY, LLP’S COUNTERCLAIM

-2-

1
2

Dated: May 12, 2011

By:

/s/
Richard Idell
Ory Sandel
Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Counter-Defendants
STEPHAN JENKINS, THIRD EYE BLIND, INC.,
3EB TOURING, INC. and STEPHAN JENKINS
PRODUCTIONS, INC.

3
4
5
6
7

ATTESTATION OF CONCURRENCE

8
9
10

I, Richard J. Idell, as the ECF user and filer of this document, attest that, pursuant to
General Order No. 45(X)(B), concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from
Harlan B. Watkins, the above signatory.

11

IDELL & SEITEL LLP

12

Dated: May 12, 2011

By:

/s/
Richard Idell
Ory Sandel
Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Counter-Defendants
STEPHAN JENKINS, THIRD EYE BLIND, INC.,
3EB TOURING, INC. and STEPHAN JENKINS
PRODUCTIONS, INC.

13
14
15
16
17
18

[PROPOSED] ORDER

19

PURSUANT TO THE ABOVE STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

RT

26

ER

n
M. Che

28

A

H

27

R NIA

dward
Judge E

NO

25

Hon. Edward M. Chen
ED
Magistrate RDER the United States District Court
SO O Judge of
IS
ITNorthern District of California

FO

24

5/25/11

UNIT
ED

23

Dated:

RT
U
O

22

S

21

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

LI

20

N

D IS T IC T
R

OF

C

STIPULATION FURTHER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO
COUNTER-CLAIMANT HISCOCK & BARCLAY, LLP’S COUNTERCLAIM

-3-