Jenkins et al v. Mandelbaum et al

Filing 47

STIPULATION AND ORDER RESETTING STATUS re 45 Stipulation filed by 3EB Touring Inc, Stephan Jenkins Productions Inc, Third Eye Blind Inc, Stephan Jenkins Replies due by 8/24/2011. Status Conference set for 11/7/2011 10:30 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Edward M. Chen.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 8/3/11. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/3/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 RICHARD J. IDELL, ESQ. (SBN 069033) ORY SANDEL, ESQ. (SBN 233204) IDELL & SEITEL LLP 465 California Street, Suite 300 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 986-2400 Facsimile: (415) 392-9259 Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Counter-Defendants STEPHAN JENKINS, THIRD EYE BLIND, INC., 3EB TOURING, INC. and STEPHAN JENKINS PRODUCTIONS, INC. JAMES A. MURPHY, ESQ. (SBN 062223) MURPHY, PEARSON, BRADLEY & FEENEY 88 Kearny Street, 10th Floor San Francisco, CA 94108-5530 Telephone: (415) 788-1900 Facsimile: (415) 393-8087 13 14 Attorneys for Defendant and Cross-Claimant HISCOCK & BARCLAY, LLP 15 16 17 KENNETH M. LABBATE, ESQ. (admitted pro hac vice) SANJIT SHAH, ESQ. (admitted pro hac vice) DAVID A. NELSON, ESQ. (admitted pro hac vice) MOUND, COTTON, WOLLAN & GREENGRASS 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 JOSEPH M. RIMAC, ESQ. (SBN 072381) WILLIAM REILLY, ESQ. (SBN 177550) RIMAC & MARTIN, P.C. 1051 Divisadero Street San Francisco, California 94115 Telephone: (415) 561-8440 Facsimile: (415) 561-8430 Attorneys for Defendants Thomas I. Mandelbaum and Selverne, Mandelbaum & Mintz, LLP 25 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 26 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 27 28 STEPHAN JENKINS, an individual; THIRD EYE BLIND, INC., a California corporation; 3EB TOURING, INC., a California Case No.: CV-11-0211 EMC STIPULATION RE: FURTHER and related Case No. C11-3232 SI (Fredianelli v. Stephan Jenkins, et 1 al) STIPULATION RE: FURTHER EXTENSION OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 1 2 corporation; and STEPHAN JENKINS PRODUCTIONS, INC., a California corporation, 3 Plaintiffs, 4 5 6 7 8 vs. EXTENSION OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER (E-filing) Hon. Edward M. Chen, Presiding THOMAS IRVING MANDELBAUM, an individual; SELVERNE, MANDELBAUM & MINTZ, LLP, a New York limited liability partnership; HISCOCK & BARCLAY, LLP, a New York limited liability partnership; and DOES 1 through 500, inclusive, Defendants. 9 10 11 HISCOCK & BARCLAY, LLP, a New York limited liability partnership, 12 Counter-Claimant, vs. 13 14 15 16 17 STEPHAN JENKINS, an individual; THIRD EYE BLIND, INC., a California corporation; 3EB TOURING, INC., a California corporation; and STEPHAN JENKINS PRODUCTIONS, INC., a California corporation, Counter-Defendants. 18 19 20 This Stipulation is entered into by and between all of the parties to the above action through their undersigned attorneys: 21 WHEREAS, the court at the last Case Management Conference ordered the case to 22 mediation with a private mediator and ordered that the case be mediated before July 31, 2011; 23 and 24 WHEREAS, the parties sought and obtained the agreement of the parties in a related 25 case, Fredianelli v. Jenkins, Action No. 11-CV-01562-R-JC (originally filed in the Central 26 District; transferred to the Northern District) to mediate the case with the above-referenced 27 matter; and 28 2 STIPULATION RE: FURTHER EXTENSION OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 1 2 WHEREAS, the parties agreed to mediate both cases before the Hon. Judge Scott Snowden (Ret.) of JAMS; and 3 WHEREAS, the case was mediated over a two-day period, July 12 and 13, 2011; and 4 WHEREAS, the parties are still working on settlement and jointly believe that additional 5 6 time is needed to complete the mediation process and explore settlement; NOW THEREFORE, the parties jointly request that the Court continue the Case 7 Management Conference now set for August 12, 2011, for at least 90 days until a date in 8 November of 2011, continue the effectiveness of its Case Management and Pretrial Order of 9 April 22, 2011, including, but not limited to the provision that no motion(s) for summary 10 judgment shall be filed prior to completion of mediation, and continue the mediation completion 11 date for 90 days or until October 31, 2011. 12 13 14 MURPHY, PEARSON, BRADLEY & FEENEY Dated: July 25, 2011 By: 15 16 /s/ James Murphy Attorneys for Defendant and Cross-Claimant HISCOCK & BARCLAY, LLP 17 MOUND COTTON WOLLAN & GREENGRASS 18 19 Dated: July 25, 2011 By: 20 21 22 /s/ Kenneth M. Labbate Sanjit Shah Attorneys for Defendants Thomas I. Mandelbaum; and Selverne, Mandelbaum & Mintz, LLP 23 IDELL & SEITEL LLP 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: July 25, 2011 By: /s/ Richard Idell Ory Sandel Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Counter-Defendants STEPHAN JENKINS, THIRD EYE BLIND, INC., 3EB TOURING, INC. and STEPHAN JENKINS PRODUCTIONS, INC. 3 STIPULATION RE: FURTHER EXTENSION OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 1 ATTESTATION OF CONCURRENCE 2 I, Richard J. Idell, as the ECF user and filer of this document, attest that, pursuant to 3 General Order No. 45(X)(B), concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from 4 Sanjit Shah and James Murphy, the above signatories. 5 6 IDELL & SEITEL LLP Dated: July 25, 2011 7 8 9 10 By: /s/ Richard Idell Ory Sandel Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Counter-Defendants STEPHAN JENKINS, THIRD EYE BLIND, INC., 3EB TOURING, INC. and STEPHAN JENKINS PRODUCTIONS, INC. 11 [PROPOSED] ORDER 12 18 RT 20 dwar Judge E ER 22 A H 21 en d M. Ch NO 19 OO IT IS S IFIED S MOD A R NIA Judge of the United States District Court D Northern District of California RDERE FO 17 RT U O 16 8/3/11 LI Dated: 15 ISTRIC ES D TC T TA Hon. Edward M. Chen S 14 PURSUANT TO THE ABOVE STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. The Status Conference for both related cases is set for 11/7/11 at 10:30 a.m. An updated Status Report shall be filed by 10/31/11. UNIT ED 13 N F D IS T IC T O R C 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 STIPULATION RE: FURTHER EXTENSION OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?