Jenkins et al v. Mandelbaum et al
Filing
49
STIPULATION AND ORDER RESETTING DMC re 48 Stipulation filed by 3EB Touring Inc, Stephan Jenkins Productions Inc, Third Eye Blind Inc, Stephan Jenkins Status Report due by 3/2/2012. Status Conference set for 3/9/2012 10:30 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Edward M. Chen.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 10/31/11. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/31/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
RICHARD J. IDELL, ESQ. (SBN 069033)
ORY SANDEL, ESQ. (SBN 233204)
IDELL & SEITEL LLP
465 California Street, Suite 300
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: (415) 986-2400
Facsimile: (415) 392-9259
Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Counter-Defendants
STEPHAN JENKINS, THIRD EYE BLIND, INC.,
3EB TOURING, INC. and STEPHAN JENKINS
PRODUCTIONS, INC.
JAMES A. MURPHY, ESQ. (SBN 062223)
MURPHY, PEARSON, BRADLEY & FEENEY
88 Kearny Street, 10th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94108-5530
Telephone: (415) 788-1900
Facsimile: (415) 393-8087
13
14
Attorneys for Defendant and Cross-Claimant
HISCOCK & BARCLAY, LLP
15
16
17
KENNETH M. LABBATE, ESQ. (admitted pro hac vice)
SANJIT SHAH, ESQ. (admitted pro hac vice)
DAVID A. NELSON, ESQ. (admitted pro hac vice)
MOUND, COTTON, WOLLAN & GREENGRASS
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
JOSEPH M. RIMAC, ESQ. (SBN 072381)
WILLIAM REILLY, ESQ. (SBN 177550)
RIMAC & MARTIN, P.C.
1051 Divisadero Street
San Francisco, California 94115
Telephone: (415) 561-8440
Facsimile: (415) 561-8430
Attorneys for Defendants Thomas I. Mandelbaum
and Selverne, Mandelbaum & Mintz, LLP
25
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
26
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
27
28
STEPHAN JENKINS, an individual; THIRD
EYE BLIND, INC., a California corporation;
3EB TOURING, INC., a California
Case No.: CV-11-0211 EMC
STIPULATION RE: FURTHER
1
STIPULATION RE: FURTHER EXTENSION OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
1
2
corporation; and STEPHAN JENKINS
PRODUCTIONS, INC., a California
corporation,
3
4
5
6
7
8
Plaintiffs,
vs.
EXTENSION OF CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE;
[PROPOSED] ORDER
(E-filing)
Hon. Edward M. Chen, Presiding
THOMAS IRVING MANDELBAUM, an
individual; SELVERNE, MANDELBAUM &
MINTZ, LLP, a New York limited liability
partnership; HISCOCK & BARCLAY, LLP, a
New York limited liability partnership; and
DOES 1 through 500, inclusive,
Defendants.
9
10
11
HISCOCK & BARCLAY, LLP, a New York
limited liability partnership,
12
Counter-Claimant,
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
vs.
STEPHAN JENKINS, an individual; THIRD
EYE BLIND, INC., a California corporation;
3EB TOURING, INC., a California
corporation; and STEPHAN JENKINS
PRODUCTIONS, INC., a California
corporation,
Counter-Defendants.
This Stipulation is entered into by and between all of the parties to the above action
through their undersigned attorneys:
WHEREAS, the Court, at the Case Management Conference held on April 20, 2011,
22
ordered the case to mediation with a private mediator and ordered that the case be mediated
23
before July 31, 2011; and
24
WHEREAS, the parties sought and obtained the agreement of the parties in a related
25
case, Fredianelli v. Jenkins, Action No. 11-CV-01562-R-JC (originally filed in the Central
26
District; transferred to the Northern District) (“Fredianelli Case”), to mediate the case together
27
with the above-referenced matter; and
28
2
STIPULATION RE: FURTHER EXTENSION OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
1
2
WHEREAS, the Fredianelli Case has also now been assigned to the Hon. Judge Edward
Chen; and
3
4
WHEREAS, the parties agreed to mediate both cases before the Hon. Judge Scott
Snowden (Ret.) of JAMS; and
5
6
WHEREAS, the two cases were mediated over a two-day period, July 12 and 13, 2011;
and
7
WHEREAS, since the parties were still working on settlement, after the July mediation,
8
and jointly believed that additional time was needed to complete the mediation process and
9
negotiate a global resolution of this action and the Fredianelli Case, the parties jointly requested
10
that the Court continue the August 12, 2011 Case Management Conference for 90 days; and
11
WHEREAS, the Court did continue the Case Management Conference set for August 12,
12
2011, to November 7, 2011, and continued the effectiveness of its Case Management and Pretrial
13
Order of April 22, 2011, including, but not limited to the provision that no motion(s) for
14
summary judgment shall be filed prior to completion of mediation, and continue the mediation
15
completion date for 90 days or until October 31, 2011, by the Court’s Order of August 3, 2011;
16
and
17
18
19
WHEREAS, the Case Management Conference in the Fredianelli Case is also set for
November 7, 2011; and
WHEREAS, although the parties’ efforts to achieve a global resolution by October 31,
20
2011 were hindered by the decisions of certain parties in the Fredianelli Case, i.e., Plaintiff
21
Anthony Fredianelli and Defendants David Rawson and Zeisler, Zeisler, Rawson & Johnson,
22
LLP, to discharge the attorneys who had represented them during the July 2011 mediation
23
sessions and retain new counsel, the parties are still working on settlement and have scheduled
24
an additional mediation session in the Fredianelli Case for November 16, 2011; and
25
WHEREAS, if the parties are successful in settling this Fredianelli Case on November
26
16, 2011, an additional mediation session will be set in the Jenkins v. Mandelbaum case in
27
December, 2011; and
28
3
STIPULATION RE: FURTHER EXTENSION OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
1
WHEREAS, if for any reason one or both of the cases do not settle, the parties agree that
2
a new trial date and discovery schedule will need to be set at the upcoming and continued Case
3
Management Conferences, since the parties have not engaged in any discovery other than the
4
limited exchange of documents, and the fact discovery cut-off date in this action is March 26,
5
2012.
6
NOW THEREFORE, the parties jointly agree to continue the Case Management
7
Conference now set for November 7, 2011, for at least 90 days to a date after January 30, 2012,
8
and to continue the effectiveness of the Case Management Pretrial Order of April 22, 2011,
9
including but not limited to the provision that no motion(s) for summary judgment shall be filed
10
prior to completion of mediation, and continue the mediation completion date for 90 days or until
11
February 29, 2012.
12
13
14
MURPHY, PEARSON, BRADLEY & FEENEY
Dated: October 25, 2011
By:
15
16
/s/
James Murphy
Attorneys for Defendant and Cross-Claimant
HISCOCK & BARCLAY, LLP
17
MOUND COTTON WOLLAN & GREENGRASS
18
19
Dated: October 25, 2011
By:
20
21
22
/s/
Kenneth M. Labbate
Sanjit Shah
Attorneys for Defendants Thomas I. Mandelbaum;
and Selverne, Mandelbaum & Mintz, LLP
23
IDELL & SEITEL LLP
24
25
26
27
28
Dated: October 25, 2011
By:
/s/
Richard Idell
Ory Sandel
Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Counter-Defendants
STEPHAN JENKINS, THIRD EYE BLIND, INC.,
3EB TOURING, INC. and STEPHAN JENKINS
PRODUCTIONS, INC.
4
STIPULATION RE: FURTHER EXTENSION OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
1
2
ATTESTATION OF CONCURRENCE
I, Richard J. Idell, as the ECF user and filer of this document, attest that, pursuant to
3
General Order No. 45(X)(B), concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from
4
Sanjit Shah and James Murphy, the above signatories.
5
6
IDELL & SEITEL LLP
Dated: October 25, 2011
By:
/s/
Richard Idell
Ory Sandel
Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Counter-Defendants
STEPHAN JENKINS, THIRD EYE BLIND, INC.,
3EB TOURING, INC. and STEPHAN JENKINS
PRODUCTIONS, INC.
7
8
9
10
11
RT
U
O
18
21
DIFI
hen
rd M. C
ER
H
20
dwa
Judge E
RT
19
AS MO
LI
17
A
16
NO
15
UNIT
ED
S
14
PURSUANT TO THE ABOVE STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. Status Conference
is reset from
DISTRIC
11/7/11 to 3/9/12 at
ES
TC
AT
10/31/11
10:30 a.m.
T
Dated:
Hon. Edward M. Chen
Judge of the ERED States District Court
United
RD
Northern
S SO O District of California
IT I
ED
R NIA
13
[PROPOSED] ORDER
FO
12
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
5
STIPULATION RE: FURTHER EXTENSION OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?