Cordova v. Convergys, Inc

Filing 34

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 7/19/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/19/2011)

*E-Filed 7/18/11*

1
2
3
4

GUY O. KORNBLUM [SBN 39974]
GUY KORNBLUM & ASSOCIATES
1388 Sutter Street, Suite 820
San Francisco, California 94109
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]

5
6
7
8
9

PHILLIP A. JARET, ESQ. [SBN 092212]
ROBERT S. JARET, ESQ. [SBN 124876]
JARET & JARET
1016 Lincoln Avenue
San Rafael, California 94901
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]

10
11
12

Attorneys for Plaintiff
JON J. CORDOVA

13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

14

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
v.
)
)
CONVERGYS CORPORATION, a Corporation, )
)
)
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
JON J. CORDOVA, an individual,

Case No. CV11-0333 RS
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
RE: PLAINTIFF’S SECOND AMENDED
COMPLAINT

27
28
0
Stipulation Re: the Filing of Second Amended Complaint - CV11-0333 RS

1

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff JON CORDOVA (“Plaintiff”) and

2

Defendant CONVERGYS CORPORATION (“Defendant”), by and through their respective counsel, as

3

follows:

4
5
6

1.

Plaintiffs may file a Second Amended Complaint in the form of EXHIBIT 1 hereto

without a motion and upon the Court’s Order based on this Stipulation;
2.

By agreeing to the filing of the Second Amended Complaint without the necessity of a

7

Motion for Leave to Amend, Defendant is: a) not waiving any right to file a responsive pleading in any

8

form, including a Motion to Dismiss or Strike; and b) not admitting any fact or contention set forth in

9

said Second Amended Complaint;

10
11

3.

Defendant shall have 21 days from the date of the filing of Plaintiff’s Second Amended

Complaint to file and serve its responsive pleading thereto.

12
13

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

14
15

DATED: July 18, 2011

GUY KORNBLUM & ASSOCIATES

16
By s/Walter G. Crump____
WALTER G. CRUMP
Attorneys for Plaintiff

17
18
19
20

DATED: July 18, 2011

OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK &
STEWART, P.C.

21
22
23

By s/ Thomas M. McInerney____
THOMAS M. McINERNEY
Attorney for Defendant

24
25
26

ORDER

27
28

PURSUANT TO THE PARTIES’ STIPULATION SET FORTH ABOVE AND GOOD CAUSE
BEING SHOWN THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Plaintiff may forthwith file his
1
Stipulation Re: the Filing of Second Amended Complaint - CV11-0333 RS

1

Second Amended Complaint in the form of EXHIBIT 1 hereto, and that the other terms of the above

2

stipulation are incorporated into this order.

3
4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

5
6

7/19/11
Dated: __________________________

7
8
9

_____________________________________
HON. RICHARD SEEBORG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Stipulation Re: the Filing of Second Amended Complaint - CV11-0333 RS