Jazz Casual Productions, Inc. v. Byron et al

Filing 17

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 4/18/11. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/18/2011)

Download PDF
Case3:11-cv-00352-JCS Document9 Filed04/12/11 Page1 of 3 Frank M. Washko (SBN 252010) BLACK & WASHKO LLP 333 Main Street, Suite 2A San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: 415-369-9423 Facsimile: 415-520-6840 fwashko@bwlitigation.com Steven Ames Brown (SBN 83363) ENTERTAINMENT LAW 69 Grand View Avenue San Francisco, CA 94114-2741 Telephone: 415-647-7700 Facsimile: 415-285-3048 sabrown@EntertaimentLaw.com 6 Attorney for Defendants Attorney for Plaintiff 7 EUROARTS MUSIC INTERNATIONAL GmbH NAXOS OF AMERICA, INC. JAZZ CASUAL PRODUCTIONS, INC. 1 2 3 4 5 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 12 13 JAZZ CASUAL PRODUCTIONS, INC. 14 15 Case No.: 3:11-CV-00352 Plaintiff, STIPULATED EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT vs. 16 17 18 19 TOBY BYRON, EAST STINSON, INC. dba TOBY BYRON MULTIPRISES, INC., EUROARTS MUSIC INTERNATIONAL GmbH, NAXOS OF AMERICA, INC. 20 21 Defendants. 22 23 Plaintiff Jazz Casual Productions, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants EuroArts Music International 24 GmbH, and Naxos of America, Inc., (collectively, “Defendants”), pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1 and 25 26 27 6-2, respectfully request that the Court enter the following stipulation regarding the time for Defendants to answer, move, or otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint. The parties now AGREE AND STIPULATE that the time for Defendants to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Complaint is 28 -1STIPULATED EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT CASE NO. 3:11-CV-00352 Case3:11-cv-00352-JCS Document9 1 Filed04/12/11 Page2 of 3 extended through and including April 28, 2011. 2 1. 3 At the request of Defendants, the parties have met and conferred and jointly agree to the 4 Reason for Extension of Time. requested extension for the convenience of the parties. 5 2. Prior Time Modifications. 6 There have been no previous time modifications in this case. 7 3. 8 The requested extension will have no effect on the rest of the schedule in this action. Effect of Modification. 9 Respectfully submitted, 10 11 Dated: April 12, 2011 12 BLACK & WASHKO LLP Frank M. Washko 13 14 By: Frank M. Washko /s/ Frank M. Washko 15 Attorney for Defendants 16 17 18 Dated: April 12, 2011 19 ENTERTAINMENT LAW Steven A. Brown 20 By: 21 22 Steven A. Brown /s/ Steven A. Brown Attorney for Plaintiff 23 24 25 Filer’s Attestation: Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B) regarding signatures, Frank M. Washko hereby attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained. 26 27 28 -2STIPULATED EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT CASE NO. 3:11-CV-00352 Case3:11-cv-00352-JCS Document9 Filed04/12/11 Page3 of 3 1 2 3 ORDER S 4/18/11 DATED: ____________________ 8 _____________________________________ Honorable Joseph C. Spero United States Magistrate Judge H ER LI RT 9 10 11 Spero FO NO seph C. Judge Jo A 7 ISTRIC ES D TC AT T RT U O 6 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. UNIT ED 5 R NIA 4 N F D IS T IC T O R C 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3STIPULATED EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT CASE NO. 3:11-CV-00352

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?