Hendricks v. AT&T Mobility LLC

Filing 39

ORDER for extension of time to file reply re 38 Stipulation filed by AT&T Mobility LLC, Set/Reset Deadlines 35 MOTION to Compel Arbitration and To Stay Case. ATTM's Reply due by 9/9/2011. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 8/24/2011. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/24/2011)

Download PDF
Case3:11-cv-00409-CRB Document38 I MAYER BROWN LLP JOHN NADOLENCO (SBN 2 Filed08/23/11 Page1 of 4 brown.com (sBN 232733) SAW lcornehl@mayerbrown. com 350 South Grand Avenue 25th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071-1503 Telephone : (213) 229 -9 500 Facsimile: (213) 625-0248 J 4 5 181 128) 6 7 MAYER BROWN LLP DONALD M. FALK (SBNIs02s6) 8 dfalk@mayerbrown,com Two Palo Alto Square, Suite 300 3000 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA 94306-2112 Telephone: (650) 33 I -2000 Facsimile: (650) 33 1 -2060 9 l0 11 Attorneys for Defendant T2 AT&T Mobility LLC t3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIF'ORNIA 15 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION t6 t7 PATRICK HENDRICKS, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, 18 Plaintift T9 VS. 20 AT&T MOBILITY,LLC, 2t Defendant. Case No. Cl l-00409 CRB STTPULATION AND IPROPOSEDI ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT AT&T MOBILITY LLC TO FILE REPLY Date: September 23,2011 Time: 10:00 a,m. Courtroom 8 22 Honorable Charles R. Breyer 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND IPROPOSEDI ORDER; CASE NO. CVl l-00409 CRB Case3:11-cv-00409-CRB Document38 Filed08/23/11 Page2 of 4 I WHEREAS, on July 7 ,2011, defendant AT&T Mobility LLC ("ATTM") filed a Motion 2 to Compel Arbitration and to Stay Case, and on August 8, 2011, plaintiff Patrick Hendricks filed a an Opposition to that motion; J 4 WHEREAS, pursuant to this Court's docket entry of July 7, 2011, ATTM's current 5 deadline to file a Reply in support of its motion is August 29,2071, which is 25 days before the 6 scheduled hearing date on September 23,2011; 7 8 9 t0 WHEREAS, as set forth in the accompany Declaration of Kevin Ranlett, and pursuant to Local Rules 6-1 and 6-2, ATTM requests an additional eleven days to file its Reply; WHEREAS, an extension to September 9,2011 for ATTM to file its Reply would not affect the hearing date on ATTM's motion; and l1 WHEREAS, plaintiff stipulates to this request; t2 THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED that ATTM's time to file its Reply in 13 support of its Motion to Compel Arbitration and to Stay Case shall be extended by eleven days to 14 September 9,2071. 15 t6 t7 18 AGREED TO BY: BURSOR & FISHER, P.A. MAYER BROWN LLP By: /s/ Scott A. Bursor By: /s/ John Nadolenco John Nadolenco (CA Bar No. 181 128) Scott A. Bursor (CA Bar No. 276006) t9 20 2t 22 23 24 25 26 27 369 Lexington Avenue, 1Oth Floor New York, NY 10017 Telephoné: (212) 989 -9113 Facsimile: (212) 989 -91 63 Email : scott@bursor.com 350 South Grand Avenue, 25th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071-1503 Telephone: (213)229-9500 L. Timothy Fisher (CA Bar No. 191626) Sarah N. Westcot (CA Bar No. 264916) BURSOR & FISHER P.A. 2l2l North California Blvd., Suite 1010 Walnut Creek, CA94596 Telephone: (925) 482-1 515 Facsimile: (925) 407 -2700 Email: ltfisher@bursor.com Donald M, Falk (CA Bar No. 150256) MAYER BROWN LLP Two Palo Alto Square, Suite 300 3000 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA 94306-2112 Telephone: (650) 33 l-2000 Facsimile: (650) 33 l-2060 Email : dfalk@mayerbrown. com Facsimile: (213)625-0248 Email : jnadolenco@mayerbrown. com swestcot@bursor.com Attorneys 28 þr Defendant AT&T Mobility LLC 1 STTPULATTON AND IPROPOSED] ORDER; CASE NO. CVI I-OO4O9 CRB Case3:11-cv-00409-CRB Document38 I 2 J 4 5 6 Filed08/23/11 Page3 of 4 Barry L. Davis Qtro hac vice) Daniel R. Lever (1tro hac vice) Aaron P, Davis (pro hac vice) THORNTON, DAVIS & FEIN, P.A. 80 SW Eighth Street,2gth Floor Miami, Florida 33130 Telephone: (305) 446-2646 Facsimile: (305) 441-2374 Email: davis@tdflaw.com lever@tdflaw.com adavis@tdflaw.com 7 Att orneys 8 for P I aintiff Patrick Hendriclrs 9 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION,IT IS SO ORDERED l3 t4 l5 16 RT ER l8 A H t7 er R. Brey LI NO harles Judge C R NIA S Dated: August 24 _,2011 UNIT ED t2 RT U O S DISTRICT TE C TA Honorable Charles R. Breyer DERED SO OR IT IS 1l FO l0 N D IS T IC T R OF C 19 20 2I 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 STTPULATTON AND [PROPOSED] ORDER; CASE NO. CVI I-OO4O9 CRB

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?