Bitton v. United Meat Company, Inc. et al

Filing 62

ORDER TO PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE. Show Cause Response due by 10/2/2015. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 9/9/15. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/10/2015)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES D
D
DISTRICT C
COURT

5

NORTHER DISTRIC OF CALI
RN
CT
IFORNIA

6
7

JA
ACQUES BI
ITTON,

Case No. 1
11-cv-00470
0-JSW

Plaintiff,
8
v.
9
10

UNITED MEAT COMPA
U
ANY, INC., et al.,
Defendants
s.

ORDER T PLAINT
TO
TIFF TO SH
HOW
CAUSE W
WHY CASE SHOULD N
NOT BE
DISMISSE FOR FA
ED
AILURE TO
O
PROSECU
UTE

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13

On Mar 16, 2012 the Court administrativ
rch
2,
a
vely closed t case, pu
this
ursuant to No
otices of

14

Ban
nkruptcy. On August 12 2015, the Court issued an Order re
O
2,
d
equiring tha the parties submit a
at

15

status report on the status of the Bankru
n
o
uptcy Procee
edings by no later than S
o
September 4 2015. To
4,

16

dat none of th parties to this action have respond to that O
te,
he
h
ded
Order.

17

Based on the Court review of the Bankrup Docket for the deb
o
t’s
f
ptcy
ts
btors, it appe that the
ears

18

Ban
nkruptcy cas were closed in April 2012 and A
ses
August 2012. According Plaintiff is HEREBY
gly,
Y

19

OR
RDERED TO SHOW CA
O
AUSE by no later than O
o
October 2, 20
015, why the Court shou not ree
uld

20

ope this matte for purpos of dismis
en
er
ses
ssing it for fa
ailure to pro
osecute. If Plaintiff fails to file a

21

res
sponse to this Order to Sh Cause by October 2 2015, the Court shall r
s
how
b
2,
re-open this matter and

22

dis
smiss, withou prejudice, for failure to prosecute without furt
ut
,
t
ther notice to the parties
s.

23
24

IT IS SO ORDER
S
RED.
Da
ated: Septem
mber 9, 2015

25
26
27
28

__
___________
__________
____
JE
EFFREY S. W
WHITE
Un
nited States D
District Judg
ge