Bitton v. United Meat Company, Inc. et al
Filing
63
ORDER RE-OPENING CASE AND DISMISSING WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 10/5/15. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/5/2015)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES D
D
DISTRICT C
COURT
5
NORTHER DISTRIC OF CALI
RN
CT
IFORNIA
6
7
JA
ACQUES BI
ITTON,
Case No. 1
11-cv-00470
0-JSW
Plaintiff,
8
v.
9
10
UNITED MEAT COMPA
U
ANY, INC., et al.,
ORDER R
RE-OPENIN CASE A
NG
AND
DISMISSI
ING WITHOUT PREJ
JUDICE
FOR FAIL
LURE TO P
PROSECUT
TE
Defendants
s.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
On Mar 16, 2012 the Court administrativ
rch
2,
a
vely closed t case, pu
this
ursuant to No
otices of
14
Ban
nkruptcy. On August 12 2015, the Court issued an Order re
O
2,
d
equiring tha the parties submit a
at
15
status report on the status of the Bankru
n
o
uptcy Procee
edings by no later than S
o
September 4 2015. To
4,
16
dat none of th parties to this action have respond to that O
te,
he
h
ded
Order.
17
On Sep
ptember 8, 20 the Cou issued an Order to Sh Cause d
015,
urt
n
how
directing Plai
intiff to
18
sho cause wh the Court should not re-open this matter for p
ow
hy
r
purposes of d
dismissing it for failure
19
to prosecute. Plaintiff’s re
p
P
esponse was due on Octo
ober 2, 2015 The Court noted that i Plaintiff
5.
t
if
20
fail to file a response to this Order to Show Caus by that da the Cour would re-o
led
r
t
o
se
ate,
rt
open this
21
ma
atter and dism
miss, withou prejudice, for failure to prosecute w
ut
o
without furth notice to the parties.
her
o
22
Because Plaint failed to respond to th Order to Show Cause the Court H
tiff
he
e,
HEREBY R
RE-OPENS
23
this matter, and HEREBY DISMISSES WITHOUT PREJUDI
s
d
S
T
ICE for failu to prosecu
ure
ute.
24
25
IT IS SO ORDER
S
RED.
Da
ated: Octobe 5, 2015
er
26
27
28
__
___________
__________
____
JE
EFFREY S. W
WHITE
Un
nited States D
District Judg
ge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?