Wakamatsu v. Oliver et al

Filing 19

ORDER Selecting ADR Process re 18 Stipulation and Proposed Order selecting Mediation filed by Robert W. Oliver, D.D.S. and David M. Perry, D.D.S., Inc. 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan, Robert W. Oliver, D.D.S. and David M. Perry, D.D.S., Inc., Case referred to mediation.. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 5/16/2011. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/18/2011)

Case3:11-cv-00482-CRB Document18

1
2
3
4
5

Filed05/13/11 Page1 of 3

Clarissa A. Kang, SBN 210660
Virginia H. Perkins, No. 215832
TRUCKER  HUSS
A Professional Corporation
100 Montgomery Street, 23rd Floor
San Francisco, California 94104
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
E-mail:
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

6
7
8

Attorneys for Defendants Robert W. Oliver, D.D.S. and
David M. Perry, D.D.S., Inc. 401(k)
Profit Sharing Plan and Robert W. Oliver, D.D.S.
and David M. Perry, D.D.S., Inc.

9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
Trucker  Huss
A Professional Corporation
100 Montgomery Street, 23rd Floor
San Francisco, California 94104

OAKLAND DIVISION
12
SANDRA WAKAMATSU,

Case No. C11-00482-CRB

13
Plaintiff,
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

14
vs.
15
16
17

ROBERT W. OLIVER, D.D.S. AND
DAVID M. PERRY, D.D.S., INC. 401(K)
PROFIT SHARING PLAN, AND ROBERT
W. OLIVER, D.D.S. AND DAVID M.
PERRY, D.D.S., INC.,

18
Defendants.
19
20

Counsel for Defendants Robert W. Oliver, D.D.S. and David M. Perry, D.D.S., Inc. 401(k)

21

Profit Sharing Plan and Robert W. Oliver, D.D.S. and David M. Perry, D.D.S., Inc.

22

and Plaintiff Sandra Wakamatsu report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have

23

reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:

24

///

25

///

26

///

27

///

28

///
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS ROC; Case No. C11-00482-CRB
#1169181

1

Case3:11-cv-00482-CRB Document18

Filed05/13/11 Page2 of 3

1

The Parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:

2

Court Processes:

3
4
5
6
7
8





Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4).
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)

(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is
appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR, must participate in an
ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for ADR
Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)
Private Processes:

9
Private ADR (please identify process and provider) ___________________________
10

Trucker  Huss
A Professional Corporation
100 Montgomery Street, 23rd Floor
San Francisco, California 94104

11

The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
The presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order referring the
case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered.).

12



13



14

DATED: May 13, 2011

Other requested deadline ________________________________________________
TRUCKER HUSS

15
16

By: /s/Clarissa A. Kang
Clarissa A. Kang
Attorneys for Defendants
Robert W. Oliver, D.D.S. and
David M. Perry, D.D.S., Inc. 401(k)
Profit Sharing Plan and Robert W. Oliver,
D.D.S. and David M. Perry, D.D.S., Inc.

17
18
19
20
21
22

DATED: May 13, 2011

THE LAW OFFICES OF GEOFREY M. FAUST

23
By: /s/Geoffrey M. Faust
Geoffrey M. Faust
Attorneys for Plaintiff Sandra Wakamatsu

24
25
26

///

27

///

28

///
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS ROC; Case No. C11-00482-CRB
#1169181

2

Case3:11-cv-00482-CRB Document18

1

[PROPOSED] ORDER

2
3
4
5
6

Filed05/13/11 Page3 of 3

Pursuant to the Stipulation above, the captioned matter is hereby referred to:



X



Non-binding Arbitration
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE)
Mediation
Private ADR

7
Deadline for ADR session:

8

10

X



11

IT IS SO ORDERED.

90 days from the date of this order.
Other

UNIT
ED

May 16, 2011
DATED: _______________________

RT
U
O

RT

17

ER

H

18
19

reyer

les R. B

har
Judge C

FO

16

LI

15

RDE

OO
IT IS S

R NIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT ED
R JUDGE

14

A

13

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
____________________________________

S

12

NO

Trucker  Huss
A Professional Corporation
100 Montgomery Street, 23rd Floor
San Francisco, California 94104

9

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS ROC; Case No. C11-00482-CRB
#1169181

3