Parham v. McDonald's Corporation et al

Filing 29

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED REQUEST FOR REVISED SCHEDULING ORDER; DEEMING MOTION TO DISMISS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Pursuant to stipulation, plaintiff's deadline to file a motion to remand is April 25, 2011. Defendant's deadline to file a motion to dismiss will be the date of the order on plaintiff's motion to remand + 21 days. Defendant's motion to dismiss filed April 18, 2011 is deemed withdrawn. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/20/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

RANDALL L. ALLEN (SBN 264067)
[e-mail]
PALANI P. RATHINASAMY (SBN 269852)
[e-mail]
ALSTON & BIRD LLP
275 Middlefield Road, Suite 150
Menlo Park, CA 94025-4008
Telephone:
650-838-2000
Facsimile:
650-838-2001
JANE FUGATE THORPE (Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
SCOTT A. ELDER (Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
ALSTON & BIRD LLP
1201 West Peachtree Street
Atlanta, GA 30309
Telephone:
404-881-7000
Facsimile:
404-881-7777

GEORGE RICHARD BAKER (SBN 224003)
[e-mail]
BAKER LAW, P.C.
2229 1st Avenue North
Birmingham, AL 35203
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 205.449.0050
Attorney for Plaintiff
MONET PARHAM

Attorneys for Defendants
MCDONALD’S CORPORATION and
MCDONALD’S USA, LLC.

13
14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

15

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

16

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

17
18
19

22
23

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR
REVISED SCHEDULING ORDER;
DEEMING MOTION TO DISMISS
WITHDRAWN WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Plaintiff,

20
21

Case No.: 3:11-cv-00511-MMC

MONET PARHAM, on behalf of herself and
those similarly situated,

v.
McDONALD’S CORPORATION, and
McDONALD’S USA, LLC.,
Defendants.

24
25
26
27
28

The Court has received the Parties Stipulated Request for Revised Scheduling Order.
Good cause appearing, the Request for Revised Scheduling Order is
GRANTED.

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED REQUEST FOR
REVISED SCHEDULING ORDER

1

Case No. 3:11-CV-0511-MMC

1

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the following schedule be entered:

2

Plaintiff’s Deadline to File Motion to Remand- April 25, 2011

3

Defendants’ Deadline to Respond to Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand- May 31, 2011

4

Plaintiff’s Deadline to Reply in Support of Motion to Remand- June 30, 2011

5

Hearing on Motion to Remand- July 15, 2011 at 9:00 a.m.

6

Defendants’ Deadline to File Motion to Dismiss- Date of Order denying remand + 21

7

days
Plaintiff’s Deadline to Respond to Motion to Dismiss- Date of Order denying remand +

8
9

66 days
Defendants’ Deadline to Reply In Support of Motion to Dismiss- Date of Order denying

10
11

remand + 86 days 1
DATED: April ___, 2011
20

12
13
14
15

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
LEGAL02/32578689v1

16
17

1

In light of the above, the Court deems defendants' motion to dismiss, filed April 18, 2011 and
noticed for hearing June 24, 2011, WITHDRAWN without prejudice to refiling.

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED REQUEST FOR
REVISED SCHEDULING ORDER

2

Case No. 3:11-CV-0511-MMC