The Government of Guam Retirement Fund v. Axa Rosenberg Group LLC. et al

Filing 42

ORDER GRANTING (41) Stipulation to Consolidate. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 6/30/11. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/30/2011)

Download PDF
Case3:11-cv-00536-JSW Document41 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 BERNSTEIN LITOWITZ BERGER & GROSSMANN LLP BLAIR A. NICHOLAS (Bar No. 178428) (blairn@blbglaw.com) BENJAMIN GALDSTON (Bar No. 211114) (beng@blbglaw.com) DAVID KAPLAN (Bar No. 230144) (davidk@blbglaw.com) PAUL M. JONNA (Bar No. 265389) (paulj@blbglaw.com) 12481 High Bluff Drive, Suite 300 San Diego, CA 92130 Tel: (858) 793-0070 Fax: (858) 793-0323 9 10 Co-Interim Lead Plaintiffs’ Counsel for the Proposed Class 11 Filed06/29/11 Page1 of 11 LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN, LLP KELLY M. DERMODY (Bar No. 171716) (kdermody@lchb.com) ALISON M. STOCKING (astocking@lchb.com) 275 Battery Street, 29th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111-3339 Tel: (415) 956-1000 Fax: (415) 956-1008 STEVEN E. FINEMAN (sfineman@lchb.com) RACHEL GEMAN (rgeman@lchb.com) 250 Hudson Street, 8th Floor New York, NY 10013-1413 Tel: (212) 355-9500 Fax: (212) 355-9592 12 Co-Interim Lead Plaintiffs’ Counsel for the Proposed Class 13 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 17 18 19 20 21 22 THE GOVERNMENT OF GUAM RETIREMENT FUND; THE SACRAMENTO COUNTY EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT SYSTEM; THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY HEALTH BENEFIT FUND; and THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE PIPEFITTERS LOCAL 636 DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION FUND, both individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 23 24 25 26 27 28 Lead Case No. CV 11-00536 JSW Case No. CV 11-0897 JSW Case No. CV 11-02594 DMR STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] CONSOLIDATION ORDER Courtroom: 11, 19th Floor Judge: Jeffrey S. White Plaintiffs, v. AXA ROSENBERG GROUP LLC, AXA ROSENBERG INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT LLC, BARR ROSENBERG RESEARCH CENTER LLC, and BARR ROSENBERG, Defendants. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] CONSOLIDATION ORDER Case No. CV 11-00536 JSW Case3:11-cv-00536-JSW Document41 1 2 3 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] CONSOLIDATION ORDER Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(e) and Manual for Complex Litigation, Fourth §§ 11.12 and 11.21, the parties stipulate, and the Court hereby orders, as follows: CONSOLIDATION OF RELATED CASES 4 5 Filed06/29/11 Page2 of 11 1. The actions listed below are related cases within the meaning of Civil L.R. 3-12. 6 Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 42(a), these cases are hereby consolidated into Civil Action No. CV 7 11-0536 _____________ for all purposes, including pretrial proceedings and trial (the “Consolidated 8 Action”). The Consolidated Action shall be captioned: “In re AXA Rosenberg Investor Litigation.” 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 CASE FILED The Government of Guam Retirement Fund v. AXA Rosenberg Feb. 3, 2011 Group LLC, et al., No. CV11-0536 (“Government of Guam Action”) The Board of Trustees of the National Elevator Industry Health Feb. 24, 2011 Benefit Fund v. AXA Rosenberg Group LLC, et al., No. CV110897 (“NEI Health Benefit Fund Action”) Trustees of the Carpenters Pension Fund of Illinois v. AXA May 31, 2011 Rosenberg Group, LLC et al., No. CV11-2594 (“Carpenter Action”) COURT N.D. Cal. N.D. Cal. N.D. Cal. 17 2. All related actions that are subsequently filed in, or transferred to, this District 18 shall be automatically consolidated with and into this action for all purposes. This Order shall 19 apply to every such related action, absent further order of the Court. A party that objects to such 20 consolidation, or to any other provision of this Order, must file an application for relief from this 21 Order within thirty (30) days after the date on which a copy of the order is mailed to the party’s 22 counsel, pursuant to Paragraph 3, infra. 23 3. When a case that properly belongs as part of the Consolidated Action is filed in, 24 or transferred to, this District, Interim Lead Plaintiffs’ Counsel shall file a Notice of Related 25 Cases pursuant to Civil L.R. 3-12. If the Court determines that the case is related, the clerk shall: 26 (a) place a copy of this Order in the separate file for such action; (b) serve on plaintiff’s counsel in the new case a copy of this Order; 27 28 -1- STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] CONSOLIDATION ORDER Case No. CV 11-00536 JSW Case3:11-cv-00536-JSW Document41 1 (c) 2 5 direct that this Order be served upon defendants in the new case; and 3 4 (d) 4. make the appropriate entry in the Master Docket. This Order is entered without prejudice to the rights of any party to apply for severance of any claim or action, for good cause shown. MASTER DOCKET AND CAPTION 6 7 8 9 Filed06/29/11 Page3 of 11 5. The docket in Civil Action No. CV 11-00536 shall constitute a Master Docket for this action. Hereafter, papers need only be filed in the Master Docket. 6. Every pleading filed in the Consolidated Action shall bear the following caption: 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 In re AXA ROSENBERG INVESTOR LITIGATION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 14 15 This Document Relates To: 16 Master File No. CV 11-00536 JSW CLASS ACTION 17 18 7. The file in Civil Action No. CV 11-00536 shall constitute a Master File for 19 every action in the Consolidated Action. When the document being filed pertains to all 20 actions, the phrase “All Actions” shall appear immediately after the phrase “This Document 21 Relates To:”. When a pleading applies only to some, not all, of the actions, the document 22 shall list, immediately after the phrase “This Document Relates To:”, the docket number for 23 each individual action to which the document applies, along with the last name of the first- 24 listed plaintiff in said action (e.g., “No. CV 11-00536 JSW (The Government of Guam 25 Retirement Fund)).” 26 27 28 -2- STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] CONSOLIDATION ORDER Case No. CV 11-00536 JSW Case3:11-cv-00536-JSW Document41 INTERIM LEAD PLAINTIFFS’ COUNSEL 1 2 Filed06/29/11 Page4 of 11 8. The law firms of Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann LLP and Lieff Cabraser 3 Heimann & Bernstein, LLP, presently Co-Interim Lead Plaintiffs’ Counsel for the proposed class 4 in the Government of Guam and NEI Health Benefit Fund Actions, are designated Co-Interim 5 Lead Plaintiffs’ Counsel in the Consolidated Action pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(g). 6 9. Co-Interim Lead Plaintiffs’ Counsel shall set policy for plaintiffs for the 7 prosecution of the Consolidated Action, delegate and monitor the work performed by plaintiffs’ 8 attorneys to ensure that there is no duplication of effort or unnecessary expense, coordinate on 9 behalf of plaintiffs the initiation and conduct of discovery proceedings, provide direction, 10 supervision and coordination of all the activities of plaintiffs’ counsel, and have the authority to 11 negotiate a settlement, subject to approval of the Court, and allocate fees among plaintiffs’ 12 counsel, if awarded. Any agreement reached between counsel for defendants and Co-Interim 13 Lead Plaintiffs’ Counsel shall be binding on the plaintiffs and their counsel. 14 10. Co-Interim Lead Plaintiffs’ Counsel shall be responsible for coordinating all 15 activities and appearances on behalf of plaintiffs in the Consolidated Action and for the 16 dissemination of notices and orders of this Court. No motion, request for discovery or other pre- 17 trial or trial proceedings shall be initiated or filed by any plaintiffs in the Consolidated Action 18 except through Co-Interim Lead Plaintiffs’ Counsel. 19 11. Co-Interim Lead Plaintiffs’ Counsel also shall be available and responsible for 20 communications to and from this Court, including distributing orders and other directions from 21 the Court to counsel. Co-Interim Lead Plaintiffs’ Counsel shall be responsible for creating and 22 maintaining a master service list of all parties and their respective counsel. 23 12. Defendants take no position on the designation of Co-Interim Lead Plaintiffs’ 24 Counsel, and this Order is issued without prejudice to any grounds defendants may later assert in 25 connection with class certification proceedings in this or any other action. 26 27 13. Defendants’ counsel may rely upon agreements made with Co-Interim Lead Plaintiffs’ Counsel. Such agreements shall be binding on all plaintiffs. 28 -3- STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] CONSOLIDATION ORDER Case No. CV 11-00536 JSW Case3:11-cv-00536-JSW Document41 1 14. Filed06/29/11 Page5 of 11 Any counsel of record for a party in this action or a related action who is not a 2 member of the Bar of this District but has been admitted to practice pro hac vice in this action or 3 such related action is hereby admitted to practice pro hac vice in the Consolidated Action. PLEADINGS AND MOTIONS 4 5 15. The Consolidated Complaint filed April 15, 2011 in the Government of Guam 6 Action [Dkt. #20] (“Consolidated Complaint”) shall be deemed the operative complaint in the 7 Consolidated Action. Defendants are not required to respond to the complaint in any action 8 consolidated into this action other than the Consolidated Complaint or a complaint subsequently 9 designated by Co-Interim Lead Plaintiffs’ Counsel as the operative complaint. 10 11 12 16. All deadlines and orders in the Government of Guam Action shall apply in the Consolidated Action until further order of the Court. 17. The parties shall serve all papers on each other by hand, by overnight delivery, by 13 email, or (by prior agreement) by facsimile, unless otherwise agreed upon by the parties. 14 Notwithstanding the foregoing, defendants may serve plaintiffs’ counsel, other than Co-Interim 15 Lead Plaintiffs’ Counsel, by first-class mail, unless otherwise agreed upon by the parties. 16 17 Dated: June 29, 2011 Respectfully submitted, BERNSTEIN LITOWITZ BERGER & GROSSMANN LLP BLAIR A. NICHOLAS BENJAMIN GALDSTON DAVID KAPLAN PAUL M. JONNA 18 19 20 21 22 /s/ Blair A. Nicholas BLAIR A. NICHOLAS 23 12481 High Bluff Drive, Suite 300 San Diego, CA 92130 Tel: (858) 793-0070 Fax: (858) 793-0323 24 25 26 Co-Interim Lead Plaintiffs’ Counsel for the Proposed Class 27 28 -4- STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] CONSOLIDATION ORDER Case No. CV 11-00536 JSW Case3:11-cv-00536-JSW Document41 1 Dated: June 29, 2011 Filed06/29/11 Page6 of 11 Respectfully submitted, 2 LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN, LLP STEVEN E. FINEMAN RACHEL GEMAN KELLY M. DERMODY ALISON M. STOCKING 3 4 5 6 /s/ Rachel Geman RACHEL GEMAN 7 275 Battery Street, 29th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111-3339 Tel: (415) 956-1000 Fax: (415) 956-1008 8 9 10 250 Hudson Street, 8th Floor New York, NY 10013-1413 Tel: (212) 355-9500 Fax: (212) 355-9592 11 12 Co-Interim Lead Plaintiffs’ Counsel for the Proposed Class 13 14 15 Dated: June 29, 2011 Respectfully submitted, 16 ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD LLP DAVID J. GEORGE 17 18 /s/ David J. George DAVID J. GEORGE 19 20 120 E. Palmetto Park Road, Suite 500 Boca Raton, FL 33432 Tel: (561) 750-3000 Fax: (561) 21 22 Attorneys for Plaintiff Trustees of the Carpenters Pension Fund of Illinois 23 24 25 Dated: June 29, 2011 Respectfully submitted, 26 MAYER BROWN LLP LEE H. RUBIN 27 28 -5- STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] CONSOLIDATION ORDER Case No. CV 11-00536 JSW Case3:11-cv-00536-JSW Document41 Filed06/29/11 Page7 of 11 /s/ Lee H. Rubin LEE H. RUBIN 1 2 Two Palo Alto Square, Suite 300 3000 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA 94306-2112 Tel: (650) 331-2037 Fax: (650) 331-2060 3 4 5 Attorneys for Defendants AXA Rosenberg Group LLC, AXA Rosenberg Investment Management, and Barr Rosenberg Research Center LLC 6 7 8 Dated: June 29, 2011 Respectfully submitted, 9 COBLENTZ, PATCH, DUFFY & BASS, LLP JONATHAN BASS 10 11 /s/ Jonathan Bass JONATHAN BASS 12 13 One Ferry Building, Suite 200 San Francisco, CA 94111-4213 Tel: (415) 391-4800 Fax: (415) 989-1663 14 15 Attorneys for Defendant Barr Rosenberg 16 17 18 19 THE FOREGOING STIPULATION 20 21 IS APPROVED AND IS SO ORDERED. 22 23 June 30 DATED: ________________ , 2011 ______________________________________ JUDGE JEFFREY S. WHITE 24 25 26 27 28 -6- STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] CONSOLIDATION ORDER Case No. CV 11-00536 JSW

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?