Blau et al v. AT&T Mobility et al

Filing 23

ORDER by Judge Charles R. Breyer granting 16 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply ; denying 22 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. (crblc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/5/2011)

Download PDF
Blau et al v. AT&T Mobility et al Doc. 23 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FREDRICK M. BLAU, Plaintiff, v. AT&T MOBILITY, ET AL., Defendants. / No. C 11-00541 CRB ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO CHANGE TIME AND DENYING MOTION TO VACATE HEARING DATE Plaintiff has filed a document entitled "Plaintiff's Statement of Nonopposition to Defendants Motion to Change Time to Respond to Complaint as to Plaintiff Anthony P. Tran; and Plaintiffs' Notice of Motion and Motion to Change Time of Motions Calendared for May 6, 2011." See dckt. no. 22. In light of Plaintiff's non-opposition, the Court GRANTS Defendants' Motion to Change Time as to the Claims of Plaintiff Anthony P. Tran. See dckt. no. 16. In the second part of Plaintiff's filing, Plaintiff asks the Court to "move the hearing date for the May 6th Motions" (see dckt. nos. 13, 17, 19), in light of an amended complaint which Plaintiff hopes to file before then. The Court will not vacate the hearing date because of an amended complaint that has not yet been filed, and which, even according to Plaintiff, will only "likely" moot the pending motions. See dckt. no. 22 at 4. If and when the amended complaint is filed, the Court will determine whether the amended complaint moots the pending motions. The parties are welcome to submit their thoughts on Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 that issue to the Court upon the filing of the amended complaint. In the meantime, the motion to vacate the May 6, 2011 hearing date is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 5, 2011 CHARLES R. BREYER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE G:\CRBALL\2011\541\order re mot to ch time.wpd 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?