Blau et al v. AT&T Mobility et al
Filing
64
ORDER GRANTING JURISDICTIONAL DISCOVERY. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 10/21/2011. (crblc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/21/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
No. C 11-00541 CRB
FREDRICK M. BLAU,
ORDER GRANTING
JURISDICTIONAL DISCOVERY
Plaintiff,
v.
14
AT&T MOBILITY, et al.,
15
Defendants.
/
16
17
For the reasons stated in open court, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff sixty (60) days of
18
jurisdictional discovery as to AT&T Inc. At the conclusion of the sixty days, Plaintiff is to
19
file a supplemental brief of no more than fifteen (15) pages as to whether it continues to
20
assert that the Court has personal jurisdiction over AT&T Inc. (and if so, why). AT&T Inc.
21
may respond with a brief of no more than fifteen (15) pages within two weeks of the filing of
22
Plaintiff’s supplemental brief. The Court takes under submission AT&T Inc.’s Motion to
23
Dismiss (dkt. 36) and AT&T Mobility and AT&T Inc.’s Motion to Compel Arbitration (dkt.
24
38). The Court will rule on both motions once the supplemental jurisdictional briefing is
25
complete.
26
IT IS SO ORDERED.
27
28
Dated: October 21, 2011
G:\CRBALL\2011\541\order 10-21-11.wpd
CHARLES R. BREYER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?