Blau et al v. AT&T Mobility et al

Filing 64

ORDER GRANTING JURISDICTIONAL DISCOVERY. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 10/21/2011. (crblc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/21/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 No. C 11-00541 CRB FREDRICK M. BLAU, ORDER GRANTING JURISDICTIONAL DISCOVERY Plaintiff, v. 14 AT&T MOBILITY, et al., 15 Defendants. / 16 17 For the reasons stated in open court, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff sixty (60) days of 18 jurisdictional discovery as to AT&T Inc. At the conclusion of the sixty days, Plaintiff is to 19 file a supplemental brief of no more than fifteen (15) pages as to whether it continues to 20 assert that the Court has personal jurisdiction over AT&T Inc. (and if so, why). AT&T Inc. 21 may respond with a brief of no more than fifteen (15) pages within two weeks of the filing of 22 Plaintiff’s supplemental brief. The Court takes under submission AT&T Inc.’s Motion to 23 Dismiss (dkt. 36) and AT&T Mobility and AT&T Inc.’s Motion to Compel Arbitration (dkt. 24 38). The Court will rule on both motions once the supplemental jurisdictional briefing is 25 complete. 26 IT IS SO ORDERED. 27 28 Dated: October 21, 2011 G:\CRBALL\2011\541\order 10-21-11.wpd CHARLES R. BREYER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?