Vollmar v. International Business Machines Corporation

Filing 25

ORDER RE: STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL. The Court grants the stipulation and dismisses the Fourth, Seventh and Eighth Causes of Action and the request for punitive damages with prejudice. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on July 2, 2012. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/2/2012)

Download PDF
1 H. Larry Elam III (SBN 178836) LAW OFFICE OF H. LARRY ELAM III 2 2977 Ygnacio Valley Road, #267 Walnut Creek, California 94598 3 Telephone: (925) 465-5151 Facsimile: (925) 465-5152 4 E-mail: larry@elamfirm.com 5 Attorneys for Plaintiff DOAA VOLLMAR LAW OFFICE OF H. LARRY ELAM III 2977 Ygnacio Valley Road, #267 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 Tel: (925) 465-5151 Fax: (925) 465-5152 6 Mitchell F. Boomer (State Bar No. 121441) Douglas M. Bria (State Bar No. 226966) 7 JACKSON LEWIS LLP 199 Fremont Street, 10th Floor 8 San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (415) 394-9400 9 Facsimile: (415) 394-9401 E-mail: boomerm@jacksonlewis.com 10 E-mail: briad@jacksonlewis.com 11 Attorneys for INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 CASE NO: C-11-0629-MMC 15 DOAA VOLLMAR, 16 STIPULATION OF DISMSSAL AND ORDER PLAINTIFF, 17 v. 18 19 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION, a New York corporation 20 and DOES 1-20, 21 DEFENDANTS. 22 23 Plaintiff DOAA VOLLMAR ("Plaintiff") and Defendant INTERNATIONAL 24 BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION (hereinafter, "Defendant") file this 25 stipulation of dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). 26 1. On January 10, 2011, Plaintiff commenced this lawsuit against 27 Defendant in the Superior Court of Contra Costa County, Case No. C-11-00067. 28 -1STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL 1 2. Defendant removed the State Court action to this court on February 10, 3. Plaintiff now moves to voluntarily dismiss the Fourth Cause of Action 2 2011. 3 4 (Harassment); the Seventh Cause of Action (Breach of Implied in Fact Contract); the 5 Eighth Cause of Action (Breach of Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealings); 6 and her request for punitive damages as contained in Complaint at paragraphs 40, 50, 7 60, 72, 78, 88, and 99 and in her prayer for relief. 8 4. Defendant, who has served an answer agrees to the dismissal. 9 5. This case is not a class action under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23, a LAW OFFICE OF H. LARRY ELAM III 2977 Ygnacio Valley Road, #267 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 Tel: (925) 465-5151 Fax: (925) 465-5152 10 derivative action under Rule 23.1, or an action related to an unincorporated 11 association under Rule 23.2. 12 6. A receiver has not been appointed in this case. 13 7. This case is not governed by any federal statute that requires a court 14 order for dismissal of the case. 15 8. Plaintiff has not previously dismissed any federal or state court suite 16 based on or including the same claims as those presented in this case. 17 9. The dismissal is with prejudice. 18 Dated: June 15, 2011 LAW OFFICE OF H. LARRY ELAM III 19 20 21 /s/ H. Larry Elam H. Larry Elam III Attorneys for Plaintiff DOAA VOLLMAR 22 23 Dated: June 15, 2011 JACKSON LEWIS LLP 24 25 26 27 /s/ Mitchell F. Boomer Mitchell F. Boomer Attorneys for Defendant INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES COMPANY 28 -2STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL 1 2 3 4 5 6 ORDER ON STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL After considering the Parties stipulation of dismissal, the Court GRANTS the stipulation and dismisses the Fourth, Seventh and Eighth Causes of Action and the request for punitive damages with prejudice. July 2, 2012 SIGNED on ____________________________ 7 ___________________________________ HON. MAXINE M. CHESNEY UNITED STATES. DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 LAW OFFICE OF H. LARRY ELAM III 2977 Ygnacio Valley Road, #267 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 Tel: (925) 465-5151 Fax: (925) 465-5152 10 11 APPROVED & ENTRY REQUESTED: 12 13 /s/ H. Larry Elam H. Larry Elam III 14 Attorneys for Plaintiff DOAA VOLLMAR 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?