Vollmar v. International Business Machines Corporation
Filing
25
ORDER RE: STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL. The Court grants the stipulation and dismisses the Fourth, Seventh and Eighth Causes of Action and the request for punitive damages with prejudice. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on July 2, 2012. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/2/2012)
1 H. Larry Elam III (SBN 178836)
LAW OFFICE OF H. LARRY ELAM III
2 2977 Ygnacio Valley Road, #267
Walnut Creek, California 94598
3 Telephone: (925) 465-5151
Facsimile: (925) 465-5152
4 E-mail: larry@elamfirm.com
5 Attorneys for Plaintiff DOAA VOLLMAR
LAW OFFICE OF H. LARRY ELAM III
2977 Ygnacio Valley Road, #267
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
Tel: (925) 465-5151
Fax: (925) 465-5152
6 Mitchell F. Boomer (State Bar No. 121441)
Douglas M. Bria (State Bar No. 226966)
7 JACKSON LEWIS LLP
199 Fremont Street, 10th Floor
8 San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone: (415) 394-9400
9 Facsimile: (415) 394-9401
E-mail: boomerm@jacksonlewis.com
10 E-mail: briad@jacksonlewis.com
11 Attorneys for INTERNATIONAL
BUSINESS MACHINES
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
CASE NO: C-11-0629-MMC
15 DOAA VOLLMAR,
16
STIPULATION OF DISMSSAL
AND ORDER
PLAINTIFF,
17
v.
18
19 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES
CORPORATION, a New York corporation
20 and DOES 1-20,
21
DEFENDANTS.
22
23
Plaintiff DOAA VOLLMAR ("Plaintiff") and Defendant INTERNATIONAL
24 BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION (hereinafter, "Defendant") file this
25 stipulation of dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii).
26
1.
On January 10, 2011, Plaintiff commenced this lawsuit against
27 Defendant in the Superior Court of Contra Costa County, Case No. C-11-00067.
28
-1STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
1
2.
Defendant removed the State Court action to this court on February 10,
3.
Plaintiff now moves to voluntarily dismiss the Fourth Cause of Action
2 2011.
3
4 (Harassment); the Seventh Cause of Action (Breach of Implied in Fact Contract); the
5 Eighth Cause of Action (Breach of Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealings);
6 and her request for punitive damages as contained in Complaint at paragraphs 40, 50,
7 60, 72, 78, 88, and 99 and in her prayer for relief.
8
4.
Defendant, who has served an answer agrees to the dismissal.
9
5.
This case is not a class action under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23, a
LAW OFFICE OF H. LARRY ELAM III
2977 Ygnacio Valley Road, #267
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
Tel: (925) 465-5151
Fax: (925) 465-5152
10 derivative action under Rule 23.1, or an action related to an unincorporated
11 association under Rule 23.2.
12
6.
A receiver has not been appointed in this case.
13
7.
This case is not governed by any federal statute that requires a court
14 order for dismissal of the case.
15
8.
Plaintiff has not previously dismissed any federal or state court suite
16 based on or including the same claims as those presented in this case.
17
9.
The dismissal is with prejudice.
18 Dated: June 15, 2011
LAW OFFICE OF H. LARRY ELAM III
19
20
21
/s/ H. Larry Elam
H. Larry Elam III
Attorneys for Plaintiff DOAA VOLLMAR
22
23 Dated: June 15, 2011
JACKSON LEWIS LLP
24
25
26
27
/s/ Mitchell F. Boomer
Mitchell F. Boomer
Attorneys for Defendant INTERNATIONAL
BUSINESS MACHINES COMPANY
28
-2STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
1
2
3
4
5
6
ORDER ON STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
After considering the Parties stipulation of dismissal, the Court GRANTS the
stipulation and dismisses the Fourth, Seventh and Eighth Causes of Action and the
request for punitive damages with prejudice.
July 2, 2012
SIGNED on ____________________________
7
___________________________________
HON. MAXINE M. CHESNEY
UNITED STATES. DISTRICT JUDGE
8
9
LAW OFFICE OF H. LARRY ELAM III
2977 Ygnacio Valley Road, #267
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
Tel: (925) 465-5151
Fax: (925) 465-5152
10
11 APPROVED & ENTRY REQUESTED:
12
13 /s/ H. Larry Elam
H. Larry Elam III
14
Attorneys for Plaintiff DOAA VOLLMAR
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?