Vollmar v. International Business Machines Corporation
Filing
47
ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANT TO LODGE CHAMBERS COPY IN COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL LOCAL RULES AND THE COURT'S STANDING ORDER. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on July 26, 2012. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/26/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
11
DOAA VOLLMAR,
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
15
16
17
No. C-11-0629 MMC
ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANT TO
LODGE CHAMBERS COPY IN
COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL LOCAL
RULES AND THE COURT’S STANDING
ORDERS
v.
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES
CORPORATION, a New York corporation
and DOES 1-20,
Defendants.
/
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
On July 20, 2012, defendant International Business Machines Corporation (“IBM”)
electronically filed its Reply to plaintiff Doaa Vollmar’s Motion for Summary Judgment. IBM
has violated the Civil Local Rules of this District and the Court’s standing orders, however,
by failing “to provide for chambers a paper copy of each document that is electronically filed
. . . marked ‘Chambers Copy’.” See Civil L.R. 5-1(e)(7); see also Standing Orders For Civil
Cases Assigned to The Honorable Maxine M. Chesney ¶ 2.
IBM is hereby ORDERED to comply with the Civil Local Rules of this District and the
Court’s standing orders by immediately submitting a chambers copy of the abovereferenced document. IBM is hereby advised that if it fails in the future to comply with the
Court’s order to provide chambers copies of electronically-filed documents, the Court may
impose sanctions, including, but not limited to, striking from the record any electronically-
1
2
filed document of which a chambers copy has not been timely provided to the Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
3
4
Dated: July 26, 2012
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?