Bollinger v. Intel Corporation et al

Filing 10

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSINO OF TIME TO ANSWER OR RESPOND TO COMPLAINT. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 3/9/11. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/10/2011)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 M ORGAN , L EWIS &
B OCKIUS LLP
SAN FRANCISCO ATTORNEYS AT LAW

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP NICOLE A. DILLER, State Bar No. 154842 S. BRADLEY PERKINS, State Bar No. 257427 ANGEL T. LIN, State Bar No. 255682 One Market, Spear Street Tower San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 415-442-1001 email: [e-mail] [e-mail] [e-mail] Attorneys for Defendants Intel Corporation and Fidelity Investments Institutional Operations Company, Inc. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LEE BOLLINGER, Plaintiff, v. INTEL CORPORATION; FIDELITY INVESTMENTS INSTITUTIONAL OPERATIONS COMPANY, INC. Defendants.

Case No. 11-00646-JCS STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER OR RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(a), this Stipulation is made by and between Plaintiff Lee Bollinger and Defendants Intel Corporation and Fidelity Investments Institutional Operations Company, Inc., by and through their respective counsel of record, with respect to the following: WHEREAS, Plaintiff mailed his Complaint to Defendant Intel Corporation on or after January 13, 2011, and Defendants acknowledged receipt of a copy of the summons and Complaint on February 1, 2011; WHEREAS, Plaintiff mailed his Complaint to Defendant Fidelity Investments Institutional Operations Company, Inc. on or after January 20, 2011, and Defendants acknowledged receipt of a copy of the summons and Complaint on February 1, 2011; WHEREAS, Defendants removed this action to this Court on February 14, 2011;
DB2/22198093.2

Case No. 11-00646-JCS STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER OR RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Defendants have agreed that Plaintiff will grant Defendants an extension until March 21, 2011 to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint; and WHEREAS, the extension of time will not alter any event or deadline set by this Court in this case; NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE THAT: Defendants shall have until March 21, 2011 to file a response to the Complaint. IT IS SO STIPULATED. DATED: March 8, 2011 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP By: Dated: March 9, 2011
S
ISTRIC ES D TC AT T

/s/ Nicole A. Diller Nicole A. Diller S. Bradley Perkins Angel T. Lin Attorneys for Defendants, INTEL CORPORATION and FIDELITY INVESTMENTS INSTITUTIONAL OPERATIONS COMPANY, INC.

RT U O

UNIT ED

ER

N

F D IS T IC T O R

A

C

LI

FO

Judge Jo

seph C.

Spero

LAW OFFICES OF ANTHONY D. AGPAOA /s/ Anthony D. Agpaoa Anthony D. Agpaoa Attorney for Plaintiff, LEE BOLLINGER

By:

I, Nicole A. Diller, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this 21 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I 22 hereby attest that each of the signatories identified above has concurred in this filing. 23 DATED: March 8, 2011 24 25 26 27 28
DB2/22198093.2

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP By: /s/ Nicole A. Diller Nicole A. Diller Attorneys for Defendants, INTEL CORPORATION and FIDELITY INVESTMENTS INSTITUTIONAL OPERATIONS COMPANY, INC.

Case No. 11-00646-JCS STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER OR RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

R NIA

O ORD IT IS S

ERED

NO

RT

H

2