Pomerantz v. The life Insurance Company of North America
Filing
43
ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on October 26, 2011. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/26/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
THORNTON DAVIDSON, #166487
ERISA Law Group
2055 San Joaquin Street
Fresno, California 93721-2717
Telephone: (559) 256-9800
Facsimile:
(559) 256-9795
e-mail: thornton@erisalg.com
Attorney for Plaintiff, ALAN POMERANTZ
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
10
THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
ALAN POMERANTZ,
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
v.
)
LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH )
)
AMERICA,
)
)
Defendant.
______________________________________ )
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE, PURSUANT TO FED. R.
CIV. P. 41(a) AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff, ALAN POMERANTZ and
20
21
Case No.:CV11-0652
Defendant, LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA that the Parties agree to
22
dismiss this action in its entirety with prejudice, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a), each Party to bear
23
its own fees and costs.
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
Date: October 25, 2011
ERISA LAW GROUP LLP
2
By:
3
4
/s/ Thornton Davidson
THORNTON DAVIDSON, #166487
Attorney for Plaintiff,
Alan Pomerantz
5
6
WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ,
EDELMAN & DICKER LLP
7
8
9
Date: October 25, 2011
10
11
12
13
/s/ Sean P. Nalty
SEAN P. NALTY, No. 121253
FRANCIS TORRENCE, No. 154653
Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz,
Edelman & Dicker LLP
525 Market Street, 17th Floor
San Francisco, California 94105
sean.nalty@wilsonelser.com
Attorneys for Defendant,
LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
OF NORTH AMERICA
14
15
[PROPOSED] ORDER
16
17
IT IS SO ORDERED.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Dated: ________________
October 26, 2011
______________________________________
HONORABLE MAXINE CHESNEY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?