Pomerantz v. The life Insurance Company of North America

Filing 43

ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on October 26, 2011. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/26/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 THORNTON DAVIDSON, #166487 ERISA Law Group 2055 San Joaquin Street Fresno, California 93721-2717 Telephone: (559) 256-9800 Facsimile: (559) 256-9795 e-mail: thornton@erisalg.com Attorney for Plaintiff, ALAN POMERANTZ 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR 10 THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 ALAN POMERANTZ, ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH ) ) AMERICA, ) ) Defendant. ______________________________________ ) STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE, PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a) AND [PROPOSED] ORDER IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff, ALAN POMERANTZ and 20 21 Case No.:CV11-0652 Defendant, LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA that the Parties agree to 22 dismiss this action in its entirety with prejudice, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a), each Party to bear 23 its own fees and costs. 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 Date: October 25, 2011 ERISA LAW GROUP LLP 2 By: 3 4 /s/ Thornton Davidson THORNTON DAVIDSON, #166487 Attorney for Plaintiff, Alan Pomerantz 5 6 WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN & DICKER LLP 7 8 9 Date: October 25, 2011 10 11 12 13 /s/ Sean P. Nalty SEAN P. NALTY, No. 121253 FRANCIS TORRENCE, No. 154653 Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker LLP 525 Market Street, 17th Floor San Francisco, California 94105 sean.nalty@wilsonelser.com Attorneys for Defendant, LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA 14 15 [PROPOSED] ORDER 16 17 IT IS SO ORDERED. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: ________________ October 26, 2011 ______________________________________ HONORABLE MAXINE CHESNEY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?