Vallabhapurapu et al v. Burger King Corporation
ORDER REGARDING SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING. Signed by Judge Alsup on December 2, 2011. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/2/2011)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MOHAN VALLABHAPURAPU, et al.,
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
BURGER KING CORPORATION,
No. C 11-00667 WHA
Please respond to the following: First, counsel shall advise whether plaintiffs’ counsel
have completed their own expert review of the 86 stores and give the particulars including a
general statement on the extent to which illegal barriers were found and the time line. To the
extent this has not been done, please explain why. Second, do plaintiffs contend any stores are
now out of compliance, and if not, what will be the basis for injunctive relief? Third, do defense
counsel concede that the plaintiffs encountered the barriers alleged in their complaints or
depositions, and if not, why should the defense surveys not be usable to corroborate plaintiffs’
memories? Do defense counsel waive the possibility of using the surveys to rebut the
allegations? Responses to these questions should be included in next Tuesday’s filing and the
page limits are enlarged by three pages (to eight) to accommodate this request.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: December 2, 2011.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?