Xilinx, Inc. v. Invention Investment Fund I LP et al

Filing 122

ORDER re: case schedule (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/16/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

BLACK CHANG & HAMILL LLP
Bradford J. Black (SBN 252031)
[e-mail]
Peter H. Chang (SBN 241467)
[e-mail]
Andrew G. Hamill (SBN 251156)
[e-mail]
333 Bush Street, Suite 2250
San Francisco, California 94104
Telephone:
415-813-6210
Facsimile:
415-813-6222

JONES DAY
Behrooz Shariati (SBN 174436)
[e-mail]
Laurie M. Charrington (SBN 229679)
1755 Embarcadero Road
Palo Alto, California 94303
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 650-739-3900
Attorneys for Plaintiff
XILINX, INC.

Attorneys for Defendants

9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

12
13
14

Plaintiff,

15
16
17
18
19

Case No.: 3:11-cv-0671-SI

XILINX, INC.,

v.

STIPULATED REQUEST AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING
CASE SCHEDULE

INTELLECTUAL VENTURES I LLC and
INTELLECTUAL VENTURES II LLC,
Defendants.

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-1STIPULATED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING CASE SCHEDULE

3:11-CV-0671-SI

1

Plaintiff Xilinx, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants Intellectual Ventures I LLC and Intellectual

2

Ventures II LLC (collectively, “Defendants”), hereby make the following stipulated request through

3

their respective counsel of record:

4
5

WHEREAS, on July 29, 2011, the Court held a Initial Case Management Conference in this
matter;

6

WHEREAS, on August 2, 2011, the Court ordered the Plaintiff to file an Amended Complaint

7

by August 18, 2011, ordered the Defendants to answer Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint by September

8

19, 2011, ordered the Defendants to serve their Disclosure of Asserted Claims and Preliminary

9

Infringement Contentions pursuant to Patent L.R. 3-1 and 3-2 by November 18, 2011, and ordered

10

the Plaintiff to serve its Preliminary Invalidity Contentions pursuant to Patent L.R. 3-3 and 3-4 by

11

January 10, 2012 (Dkt. No. 88);

12
13
14

WHEREAS, on September 30, 2011, the Plaintiff filed a Second Amended Complaint for
Declaratory Judgment of Patent Non-Infringement and Invalidity (Dkt. No. 100);
WHEREAS, on October 17, 2011, the Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss Xilinx’s Second

15

Amended Complaint for Declaratory Judgment (Dkt. No. 105) and have therefore not yet answered

16

or counterclaimed;

17
18
19

WHEREAS, on October 20, 2011, the Court set a hearing date for Defendants’ Motion to
Dismiss Xilinx’s Second Amended Complaint for December 2, 2011, at 9:00 a.m.;
WHEREAS, on November 14, 2011, the parties asked the Court to reset the hearing date for

20

Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Xilinx’s Second Amended Complaint from December 2, 2011, at

21

9:00 a.m. to January 20, 2012, at 9:00 a.m. to coincide with the hearing schedule of a related matter,

22

Xilinx, Inc v. Intellectual Ventures Management, LLC et. al., No. 3:11-cv-04407-SI (Dkt. No. 120);

23

WHEREAS, the parties believe rescheduling certain deadlines set by the Court on August 2,

24

2011 (Dkt. No. 88) is warranted for the convenience of the Court and parties and to promote judicial

25

economy;

26
27
28

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY REQUESTED AND STIPULATED by the Parties,
through their respective counsel of record that Defendants shall serve its Disclosure of Asserted
-2STIPULATED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING CASE SCHEDULE

3:11-CV-0671-SI

1

Claims and Preliminary Infringement Contentions pursuant to Patent L.R. 3-1 and 3-2, and otherwise

2

comply with the requirements of Patent L.R. 3-1 and 3-2, simultaneously with any counterclaims of

3

patent infringement filed in this matter. Plaintiff shall serve preliminary invalidity contentions

4

pursuant to Patent L.R. 3-3 and 3-4, and otherwise comply with the requirements of Patent L.R. 3-3

5

and 3-4, sixty days after service of Defendants’ Patent L.R. 3-1 and 3-2 disclosures.

6

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

7
Respectfully submitted,

8
9

Dated: November 15, 2011

BLACK CHANG & HAMILL LLP
Bradford J. Black

10
11

/s/
Bradford J. Black

By:

12

Attorneys for Defendants

13
14
15

Dated: November 15, 2011

16

JONES DAY
Laurie M. Charrington

17

By:

/s/
Laurie M. Charrington

18
19

Attorneys for Plaintiff

20
21
22

Attestation
I, Bradford J. Black, attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from

23

Laurie M. Charrington, counsel for Plaintiff Xilinx, Inc. I declare under penalty of perjury that the

24

foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 15th day of November 2011 in San Francisco, California.

25
26

/s/
Bradford J. Black

27
28

-3STIPULATED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING CASE SCHEDULE

3:11-CV-0671-SI

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED

1
2
3
4

Dated:

11/15/11

By:
The Honorable Susan Illston
United States District Judge

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-4STIPULATED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING CASE SCHEDULE

3:11-CV-0671-SI