Xilinx, Inc. v. Invention Investment Fund I LP et al

Filing 92

ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION TO RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/19/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6

Behrooz Shariati (State Bar. No. 174436)
[e-mail]
JONES DAY
1755 Embarcadero Road
Palo Alto, CA 94303
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

Bradford J. Black (SBN 252031)
[e-mail]
BLACK & CHANG LLP
333 Bush Street, Suite 2250
San Francisco, CA 94104
Office: 415.813.6211
Mobile: [phone]
DESMARAIS LLP
John M. Desmarais (admitted pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
Michael P. Stadnick (admitted pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
230 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10169
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile:
212-351-3401

Attorney for Plaintiff
XILINX, INC.

7
8
9

Attorneys for Defendants
INTELLECTUAL VENTURES LLC,
INTELLECTUAL VENTURES
MANAGEMENT LLC,
INTELLECTUAL VENTURES I LLC,
INTELLECTUAL VENTURES II LLC,

10
11
12
13
14
15

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

16

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

XILINX, INC.,

Case No. 3:11-cv-00671 SI
Plaintiff,

v.
INTELLECTUAL VENTURES LLC,
INTELLECTUAL VENTURES
MANAGEMENT LLC,
INTELLECTUAL VENTURES I LLC,
INTELLECTUAL VENTURES II LLC,
Defendants.

STIPULATED REQUEST TO
EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO
FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

25
26
27
28
STIPULATED REQUEST TO EXTEND TIME
Case No. 3:11-cv-00671 SI

1

Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1 and 6-2 and Plaintiff Xilinx, Inc. (“Xilinx”) and Defendants

2

Intellectual Ventures LLC, Intellectual Ventures Management, Intellectual Ventures I LLC, and

3

Intellectual Ventures II LLC (collectively, “Defendants”), by and through their respective counsel

4

of record, hereby request the Court issue an Order extending the time for Defendants to answer,

5

move or otherwise respond to Xilinx’s First Amended Complaint from September 19, 2011

6

through and including September 23, 2011.
The parties jointly request the brief extension to permit them time to meet and confer on

7
8

issues that have been raised by the parties’ recent filings in this and other related cases. The

9

requested extension would be the first extension to Defendants’ deadline to respond to the First

10

Amended Complaint, and would have no effect on the case schedule.

11
12

Dated: September 16, 2011

JONES DAY
By:

13
14

Attorneys for Plaintiff
XILINX, INC.

15
16

/s/ Behrooz Shariati

DATED: September 16, 2011

BLACK & CHANG LLP

17

By:

18

/s/ Bradford Black

Attorneys for Defendants
INTELLECTUAL VENTURES LLC,
INTELLECTUAL VENTURES
MANAGEMENT LLC,
INTELLECTUAL VENTURES I LLC, and
INTELLECTUAL VENTURES II LLC

19
20
21
22
23

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED:

24
25

Dated:

9/19/11

By:
THE HONORABLE SUSAN ILLSTON
United States District Judge
Northern District of California

26
27
28
2

STIPULATED REQUEST TO EXTEND TIME
Case No. 3:11-cv-00671 SI