Xilinx, Inc. v. Invention Investment Fund I LP et al

Filing 95

ORDER granting extension to deadline to Answer (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/27/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

Behrooz Shariati (State Bar No. 174436)
[e-mail]
Laurie M. Charrington (State Bar No. 229679)
[e-mail]
JONES DAY
1755 Embarcadero Road
Palo Alto, CA 94303
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile:
650-739-3900

Bradford J. Black (SBN 252031)
[e-mail]
Peter H. Chang (SBN 241467)
[e-mail]
BLACK CHANG & HAMILL LLP
333 Bush Street, Suite 2250
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 415-813-6222

Attorneys for Plaintiff
XILINX, INC.

Attorneys for Defendants
INTELLECTUAL VENTURES, LLC
INTELLECTUAL VENTURES
MANAGEMENT LLC,
INTELLECTUAL VENTURES I LLC, and
INTELLECTUAL VENTURES II LLC

8
9
10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

13
14

XILINX, INC.,

15
16
17
18
19
20

Case No. 3:11-cv-00671 SI
Plaintiff,

v.

SECOND STIPULATED REQUEST
TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND
TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

INTELLECTUAL VENTURES, LLC,
INTELLECTUAL VENTURES
MANAGEMENT, LLC,
INTELLECTUAL VENTURES I LLC,
INTELLECTUAL VENTURES II LLC,
Defendants.

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
SECOND STIPULATED REQUEST TO
EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND
Case No. 3:11-cv-00671 SI

1

Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1 and 6-2 and Plaintiff Xilinx, Inc. (“Xilinx”) and Defendants

2

Intellectual Ventures, LLC, Intellectual Ventures Management, LLC, Intellectual Ventures I LLC,

3

and Intellectual Ventures II LLC (collectively, “Defendants”), by and through their respective

4

counsel of record, hereby request the Court issue an Order extending the time for Defendants to

5

answer, move or otherwise respond to Xilinx’s First Amended Complaint from September 23,

6

2011 until September 30, 2011.

7

The parties jointly request the brief extension to permit Xilinx to file a Second Amended

8

Complaint, which Xilinx intends to do on or before September 30, 2011. The requested extension

9

will be the second extension to Defendants’ deadline to respond to the First Amended Complaint,

10
11
12

and will have no effect on the case schedule.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
DATED: September 23, 2011

JONES DAY

13
By:
14
15

/s/ Laurie M. Charrington
Laurie M. Charrington

Attorneys for Plaintiff
XILINX, INC.

16
17

In accordance with General Order No. 45, Section X(B), the above signatory attests that

18

concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the signatory below.

19
20

DATED: September 23, 2011

BLACK CHANG & HAMILL LLP

21
By:
22
23
24
25
26

/s/ Peter H. Chang
Peter H. Chang

Attorneys for Defendants
INTELLECTUAL VENTURES, LLC
INTELLECTUAL VENTURES
MANAGEMENT LLC,
INTELLECTUAL VENTURES I LLC, and
INTELLECTUAL VENTURES II LLC

27
28
-2-

SECOND STIPULATED REQUEST TO
EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND
Case No. 3:11-cv-00671 SI

1

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED:

2
3

Dated:

9/27/11

By:
THE HONORABLE SUSAN ILLSTON
United States District Judge
Northern District of California

4
5
6
7
8
SVI-97915

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3-

SECOND STIPULATED REQUEST TO
EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND
Case No. 3:11-cv-00671 SI