Paulick v. Marin Facilities Management Company

Filing 17

ORDER of Dismissal, ***Civil Case Terminated.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on 12/6/2011. (hlk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/6/2011)

Download PDF
SIDNEY J. COHEN, ESQ., State Bar No. 39023 SIDNEY J. COHEN PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 2 427 Grand Avenue Oakland, CA 94610 3 Telephone: (510) 893-6682 1 4 Attorneys for Plaintiff MICHAEL PAULICK 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 MICHAEL PAULICK CASE NO. C 11-00681 EDL Civil Rights 8 Plaintiff, 9 V. 10 MARIN FACILITIES MANAGEMENT COMPANY, a California Limited Partnership; 12 and DOES 1-25, Inclusive, STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL 11 13 FRCP section 41 Defendants. / 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Stipulation And Order For Dismissal 1 Plaintiff Michael Paulick (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Marin Facilities 2 Management Company, a California Limited Partnership (“Defendant”), by and 3 through their attorneys of record, file this Stipulation of Dismissal pursuant to 4 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure section 41. 5 Plaintiff filed this lawsuit on February 15, 2011. 6 Plaintiff and Defendant have entered into a “Mutual Release And 7 Settlement Agreement,” which settles all aspects of the lawsuit against 8 Defendant. A copy of the “Mutual Release And Settlement Agreement” is 9 incorporated by reference herein as if set forth in full. The “Mutual Release And 10 Settlement Agreement “ states in part that “The court shall retain jurisdiction to 11 enforce the terms of this Settlement Agreement, and this Settlement Agreement 12 shall be incorporated by reference in the Dismissal as if set forth in full.” 13 14 Plaintiff and Defendant stipulate to the court retaining jurisdiction to enforce the “Mutual Release And Settlement Agreement.” 15 Plaintiff moves to dismiss with prejudice the lawsuit against Defendant. 16 Defendant, who has answered the complaint, agrees to the dismissal with 17 prejudice. 18 This case is not a class action, and no receiver has been appointed. 19 This Stipulation and Order may be signed in counterparts, and facsimile or 20 electronically transmitted signatures shall be as valid and as binding as original 21 signatures. 22 23 Wherefore, Plaintiff and Defendant, by and through their attorneys of record, so stipulate. 24 Dated: 12/2/11 SIDNEY J. COHEN PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 25 /s/ Sidney J. Cohen 26 By Sidney J. Cohen Attorney for Plaintiff Michael Paulick 27 28 Stipulation And Order For Dismissal -1- FRIED & WILLIAMS 1 /s/ Alana Grice-Conner 2 By 3 4 5 Alana Grice-Conner Attorney for Defendant Marin Facilities Management Company, a California Limited Partnership 6 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES, IT IS SO ORDERED: The lawsuit against Defendant is dismissed with prejudice. The Court shall 7 8 retain jurisdiction to enforce the parties’ “Mutual Release And Settlement 9 Agreement.” S December 6, 2011 RT U O RT 14 ER 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Stipulation And Order For Dismissal -2- A H 15 e . Laport D lizabeth Judge E NO 13 FO 12 LI 11 R NIA Elizabeth D. Laporte United States Magistrate D E Judge ORDER O IT IS S UNIT ED 10 Date: S DISTRICT TE C TA N F D IS T IC T O R C

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?