Paulick v. Marin Facilities Management Company

Filing 17

ORDER of Dismissal, ***Civil Case Terminated.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on 12/6/2011. (hlk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/6/2011)

SIDNEY J. COHEN, ESQ., State Bar No. 39023
SIDNEY J. COHEN PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
2 427 Grand Avenue
Oakland, CA 94610
3 Telephone: [phone]
1

4

Attorneys for Plaintiff
MICHAEL PAULICK

5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7

MICHAEL PAULICK

CASE NO. C 11-00681 EDL
Civil Rights

8

Plaintiff,
9

V.
10

MARIN FACILITIES
MANAGEMENT COMPANY,
a California Limited Partnership;
12 and DOES 1-25, Inclusive,

STIPULATION AND ORDER
FOR DISMISSAL

11

13

FRCP section 41

Defendants.
/

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Stipulation And Order For Dismissal

1

Plaintiff Michael Paulick (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Marin Facilities

2

Management Company, a California Limited Partnership (“Defendant”), by and

3

through their attorneys of record, file this Stipulation of Dismissal pursuant to

4

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure section 41.

5

Plaintiff filed this lawsuit on February 15, 2011.

6

Plaintiff and Defendant have entered into a “Mutual Release And

7

Settlement Agreement,” which settles all aspects of the lawsuit against

8

Defendant. A copy of the “Mutual Release And Settlement Agreement” is

9

incorporated by reference herein as if set forth in full. The “Mutual Release And

10

Settlement Agreement “ states in part that “The court shall retain jurisdiction to

11

enforce the terms of this Settlement Agreement, and this Settlement Agreement

12

shall be incorporated by reference in the Dismissal as if set forth in full.”

13
14

Plaintiff and Defendant stipulate to the court retaining jurisdiction to
enforce the “Mutual Release And Settlement Agreement.”

15

Plaintiff moves to dismiss with prejudice the lawsuit against Defendant.

16

Defendant, who has answered the complaint, agrees to the dismissal with

17

prejudice.

18

This case is not a class action, and no receiver has been appointed.

19

This Stipulation and Order may be signed in counterparts, and facsimile or

20

electronically transmitted signatures shall be as valid and as binding as original

21

signatures.

22
23

Wherefore, Plaintiff and Defendant, by and through their attorneys of
record, so stipulate.

24 Dated: 12/2/11

SIDNEY J. COHEN
PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

25

/s/ Sidney J. Cohen

26

By

Sidney J. Cohen
Attorney for Plaintiff Michael Paulick

27
28
Stipulation And Order For Dismissal

-1-

FRIED & WILLIAMS

1

/s/ Alana Grice-Conner

2

By

3
4
5

Alana Grice-Conner
Attorney for Defendant Marin Facilities
Management Company, a California
Limited Partnership

6 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES, IT IS SO ORDERED:

The lawsuit against Defendant is dismissed with prejudice. The Court shall

7

8 retain jurisdiction to enforce the parties’ “Mutual Release And Settlement
9 Agreement.”

S

December 6, 2011

RT
U
O

RT

14

ER

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Stipulation And Order For Dismissal

-2-

A

H

15

e

. Laport

D
lizabeth
Judge E

NO

13

FO

12

LI

11

R NIA

Elizabeth D. Laporte
United States Magistrate D
E Judge
ORDER
O
IT IS S

UNIT
ED

10 Date:

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C