Xilinx, Inc. v. Intellitech Corporation

Filing 31

ORDER TO EXTEND PATENT LOCAL RULE 4-2 EXCHANGE BY ONE DAY. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on September 16, 2011. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/16/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

GLENN E. WESTREICH (SBN 100457)
DARRELL D. KINDER (SBN 255810)
PATRICK N. LUNDELL (SBN 273506)
HAYNES AND BOONE, LLP
2033 Gateway Place, Suite 300
San Jose, California 95110
Phone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

Robert F. Kramer (State Bar No. 181706)
Eric Shih (State Bar No. 156102)
Stephanie R. Wood (State Bar No. 242572)
NOVAK DRUCE + QUIGG LLP
555 Mission Street
Thirty-Fourth Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]
Email:[e-mail]

Attorneys for Plaintiff
XILINX, INC.

Attorneys for Defendant
INTELLITECH CORPORATION

9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

12
13

XILINX, INC., a Delaware Corporation,

14

Plaintiff,

Case No. 3:11–CV–0699-MMC

15

v.

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO EXTEND PATENT LOCAL
RULE 4-2 EXCHANGE BY ONE DAY

16

INTELLITECH CORPORATION, a New
Hampshire Corporation,

The Honorable Maxine M. Chesney

17

Defendant.

18
19
20

Plaintiff Xilinx, Inc. (“XILINX”) and Defendant Intellitech Corporation (“INTELLITECH”)

21

hereby stipulate and agree to extend the date to exchange proposed constructions and extrinsic

22

evidence pursuant to N.D. California Patent Local Rule 4-2 by one day from the Court ordered

23

deadline of September 15, 2011 [Dkt. Nos. 28 (Order) and 23 (Dates)] to September 16, 2011.

24
25

//

26

//

27

//

28

CIVIL ACTION NO.: 3:11–CV–0699-MMC
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND PATENT LOCAL RULE 4-2 EXCHANGE

1

1

Dated: September 15, 2011

2
3

By: /s/ Stephanie R. Wood
Stephanie Wood
NOVAK DRUCE + QUIGG LLP
Attorney for Defendant
INTELLITECH CORPORATION

4
5
6
7

By: /s/ Patrick Lundell
Patrick Lundell
HAYNES AND BOONE, LLP
Attorney for Plaintiff
XILINX, INC.

8
9
10

.

11
12
13
14
15
16
17

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

September 16
Dated: _____________, 2011

18
19

Hon. Maxine M. Chesney
United States District Judge

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

CIVIL ACTION NO.: 3:11–CV–0699-MMC
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND PATENT LOCAL RULE 4-2 EXCHANGE

2