Coronado et al v. Sprint Nextel Corporation et al
Filing
39
ORDER CONTINUING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Case Management Conference set for 10/13/2011 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 8/2/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/2/2011)
*E-Filed 8/2/11*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
BONOFACIO CORONADO; JENNIFER
CORONADO; EDUARDO CORONADO;
BARBARA PECKLER; and, HANIBALL
AMARE, Individually and On Behalf Of
All Those Similarly Situated,
Plaintiffs,
v.
SPRINT NEXTEL CORPORATION and
HTC AMERICA, INC.,
Defendants.
SPECIAL APPEARANCE
Case No. 3:11‐cv‐00706‐RS
[PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING
INTIAL CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR
AUGUST 11, 2011
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
BRYDON
HUGO & PARKER
135 MAIN STREET
20TH FLOOR
San Francisco, CA 94105
1
_______________________________________________________________________________
[PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING INTIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR AUGUST 11, 2011
CASE NO 11CV00706 RS
1
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the initial case
2
management conference currently scheduled for August 11, 2011 at 10:00 a.m. shall be continued
3
for sixty (60) days. to October 13, 2011 @ 10:00 a.m. The parties shall file a joint CMC Statement
at least one week prior to the conference.
SO ORDERED.
4
5
6
8/2/11
Dated: _________________
_____________________________________
RICHARD SEEBORG
United States District Judge
7
8
9
10
11
12
Respectfully submitted,
THE COREA FIRM, PLLC
By: /s/ Thomas M. Corea
Attorney for Plaintiffs
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
BRYDON
HUGO & PARKER
135 MAIN STREET
20TH FLOOR
San Francisco, CA 94105
2
_______________________________________________________________________________
[PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING INTIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR AUGUST 11, 2011
CASE NO 11CV00706 RS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?