Coronado et al v. Sprint Nextel Corporation et al
Filing
51
ORDER RE: MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT. Motion Hearing set for 3/29/2012 01:30 PM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Richard Seeborg.. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 2/22/12. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/23/2012)
1
*E-Filed 2/23/12*
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
9
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
11
12
BONOFACIO CORONADO; JENNIFER
CORONADO; EDUARDO CORONADO;
BARBARA PECKLER; AND HANNIBAL
AMARE, Individually and On Behalf of All
Those Similarly Situated,
No. C 11-00706 RS
ORDER RE: MOTION FOR LEAVE
TO FILE FIRST AMENDED
COMPLAINT
Plaintiffs,
13
v.
14
15
HTC AMERICA, INC.,
16
Defendant.
___________________________________/
17
18
Plaintiffs in the above-captioned action filed a motion requesting leave to file a First
19
Amended Complaint (FAC) on February 17, 2012, but neglected to notice the motion for a hearing,
20
as required by Local Rule 7-2.1 Rather than deny the motion, the Court hereby instructs the parties
21
to appear for a hearing on the motion on March 29, 2012 at 1:30 p.m. in Courtroom 3, 17th
22
Floor, in the San Francisco Federal Building and Courthouse. Consistent with the Local Rules,
23
defendant must, if it elects to do so, file an opposition to the motion by March 8, 2012. Similarly,
24
plaintiff must file a reply brief, if any, by March 15, 2012. The Court reserves the right to take the
25
motion under submission without a hearing pursuant to Local Rule 7-1(b).
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
1
Plaintiffs are hereby reminded that they must practice in compliance with the Local Rules.
Although plaintiffs separately filed the FAC on the record, it remains, of course, a proposed
amended complaint without any operative effect, unless and until plaintiffs’ motion is granted and
the FAC is properly filed.
NO. C 11-00706 RS
ORDER
1
2
3
Dated: 2-22-12
RICHARD SEEBORG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
4
5
6
7
8
9
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
NO. C 11-00706 RS
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?