Coronado et al v. Sprint Nextel Corporation et al

Filing 51

ORDER RE: MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT. Motion Hearing set for 3/29/2012 01:30 PM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Richard Seeborg.. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 2/22/12. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/23/2012)

Download PDF
1 *E-Filed 2/23/12* 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 9 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 11 12 BONOFACIO CORONADO; JENNIFER CORONADO; EDUARDO CORONADO; BARBARA PECKLER; AND HANNIBAL AMARE, Individually and On Behalf of All Those Similarly Situated, No. C 11-00706 RS ORDER RE: MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT Plaintiffs, 13 v. 14 15 HTC AMERICA, INC., 16 Defendant. ___________________________________/ 17 18 Plaintiffs in the above-captioned action filed a motion requesting leave to file a First 19 Amended Complaint (FAC) on February 17, 2012, but neglected to notice the motion for a hearing, 20 as required by Local Rule 7-2.1 Rather than deny the motion, the Court hereby instructs the parties 21 to appear for a hearing on the motion on March 29, 2012 at 1:30 p.m. in Courtroom 3, 17th 22 Floor, in the San Francisco Federal Building and Courthouse. Consistent with the Local Rules, 23 defendant must, if it elects to do so, file an opposition to the motion by March 8, 2012. Similarly, 24 plaintiff must file a reply brief, if any, by March 15, 2012. The Court reserves the right to take the 25 motion under submission without a hearing pursuant to Local Rule 7-1(b). 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. 1 Plaintiffs are hereby reminded that they must practice in compliance with the Local Rules. Although plaintiffs separately filed the FAC on the record, it remains, of course, a proposed amended complaint without any operative effect, unless and until plaintiffs’ motion is granted and the FAC is properly filed. NO. C 11-00706 RS ORDER 1 2 3 Dated: 2-22-12 RICHARD SEEBORG UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 4 5 6 7 8 9 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 NO. C 11-00706 RS ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?