Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London v. California Mortgage and Realty, Inc. et al
Filing
32
ORDER REGARDING DEFENSE COUNSEL'S MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL AND GRANTING MOTION TO ENLARGE TIME, Motions terminated: 29 MOTION to Continue DEFENDANT CALIFORNIA MORTGAGE AND REALTY, INC., AND DAVID CHOO'S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO ENLARGE TIME filed by California Mortgage and Realty, Inc., David Choo. Case Management Conference set for 6/23/2011 02:00 PM. Motion Hearing set for 6/23/2011 02:00 PM before Hon. William Alsup. Signed by Judge Alsup on May 6, 2011. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/6/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT
LLOYDS LONDON,
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
ORDER REGARDING DEFENSE
COUNSEL’S MOTION TO
WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL AND
GRANTING MOTION TO
ENLARGE TIME
v.
CALIFORNIA MORTGAGE AND
REALTY, INC., and DAVID CHOO,
15
Defendants.
/
16
17
No. C 11-00724 WHA
Counsel for defendants California Mortgage and Realty, Inc., and David Choo have filed a
18
motion to withdraw as counsel, which would leave no defense counsel behind. The motion
19
claims defendants agree to the withdrawal, because they are unable to pay defense counsel’s fees.
20
Yet, the declaration filed in support of the motion to withdraw only states: “[Counsel] sent an
21
email confirmation . . . of this understanding. Mr. Choo did not respond that his understanding
22
was to the contrary”; and “To date, Mr. Choo has not withdrawn his consent to allow Orrick to
23
withdraw as counsel of record in this matter nor has he indicated any problems with Orrick’s
24
withdrawal” (DeNatale Decl.). This is not the same as a sworn record of defendants’ non-
25
opposition to counsel’s motion.
26
27
28
This order sets a hearing on counsel’s motion to withdraw for THURSDAY, MAY 19, 2011,
AT 2:00 P.M.
Counsel for both sides, as well as defendant David Choo and a representative for
defendant California Mortgage and Realty, Inc., must attend. Defense counsel shall notify their
1
clients immediately of this requirement. Plaintiff’s counsel or defendants (as individuals) may
2
file a statement in response to the motion to withdraw at any time prior to the hearing.
3
Defense counsel also move to continue the dates of the initial case management
4
conference and the hearing on plaintiff’s motion for judgment on the pleadings so that the issue of
5
counsel’s withdrawal can be resolved first. That motion is GRANTED, and the case management
6
conference and motion hearing are both continued to JUNE 23, 2011, AT 2:00 P.M.
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
9
Dated: May 6, 2011.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?