Lambert v. United States of America et al
Filing
176
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR REVIEW OF CLERK'S ACTION RE: TAXATION OF COSTS; DIRECTIONS TO CLERK. The Clerk of Court is directed to tax costs in the amount $10,225.01. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on August 19, 2013. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/19/2013)
1
2
3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6
STEPHEN LAMBERT,
No. C 11-725 MMC
7
Plaintiff,
8
9
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S
MOTION FOR REVIEW OF CLERK’S
ACTION RE: TAXATION OF COSTS;
DIRECTIONS TO CLERK
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant.
/
11
12
Before the Court is defendant’s “Motion . . . Pursuant to Rule 54(d)(1) Requesting
13
Review of the Clerk’s Action Re: Taxation of Costs,” filed July 26, 2013. Plaintiff has filed
14
opposition. Having read and considered the papers submitted in support of and in
15
opposition to the motion, the Court deems the matter appropriate for decision on the
16
parties’ respective written submissions, VACATES the hearing scheduled for September 6,
17
2013, and rules as follows.
18
By the instant motion, defendant challenges plaintiff’s request for “mileage,” in the
19
amount of $1673.14 (see Am. Bill of Costs at 2), for witness Lindsey Docherty’s air travel
20
on a commercial airline. As defendant correctly points out, plaintiff is only entitled to the
21
amount of the actual air fare charged and paid, which, according to documents submitted
22
by both parties, totaled $385.80. See 28 U.S.C. § 1821 (providing “witness who travels by
23
common carrier shall be paid for the actual expenses of travel”).
24
25
26
27
28
Accordingly, defendant’s motion for review is hereby GRANTED, and the Clerk of
Court is hereby DIRECTED to tax costs in the amount of $10,225.01.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: August 19, 2013
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?