Empey v. Allied Property & Casualty Insurance Company
Filing
61
ORDER re 60 Letter filed by Chad Empey. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 12/15/2011. (dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/15/2011)
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
5
CHAD EMPEY,
6
7
Plaintiff(s),
v.
8
ALLIED PROPERTY,
9
No. C-11-00733 DMR
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
DISCOVERY LETTER [DOCKET NO.
60] WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND
MANDATING THAT THE PARTIES
ATTEND A COURTHOUSE
DISCOVERY CONFERENCE
Defendant(s).
___________________________________/
11
The court is in receipt of Plaintiff’s December 15, 2011 discovery letter [Docket No. 60],
12
which blames defense counsel for Plaintiff’s failure to comply with the court’s standing order
13
requiring joint discovery letters. The court has repeatedly admonished both parties’ counsel for
14
failure to follow the court’s discovery dispute process [see Docket No. 28] and for their apparent
15
refusal to engage in mutually respectful and cooperative meet and confer discussions to resolve the
16
disputes. The court therefore ORDERS that Gary T. Lafayette and Donald T. McMillan
17
shall come to the courthouse with a laptop on December 20, 2011 at 9:30 a.m. and check in at the
18
undersigned’s chambers, where they shall meet and confer to resolve the disputes contained within
19
Plaintiff’s December 15, 2011 letter, which is hereby denied without prejudice. If the parties fail to
20
reach an agreement, they shall turn immediately to drafting a joint discovery letter conforming to
21
this court’s order at that time. Any joint letter shall be e-filed before the parties leave the
22
courthouse.
RN
R NIA
. Ryu
onna M
Judge D
DONNA M. RYU
United E
States Magistrate Judge
H
28
RT
27
Dated: December 15, 2011
NO
26
FO
25
DERED
O OR
IT IS S
LI
S
IT IS SO ORDERED.
A
24
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
23
UNIT
ED
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?