Garth v. John Tennant Memorial-Episcopal Senior Communities (JTM-ESC) et al
Filing
13
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 2/28/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/1/2011)
Garth v. John Tennant Memorial-Episcopal Senior Communities (JTM-ESC) et al
Doc. 13
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 JOHN GARTH, Plaintiff, v. JOHN TENNANT MEMORIALEPISCOPAL SENIOR COMMUNITIES (JTM-ESC); VINCENT CHEUNG AND THE OAK CENTER TOWERS OFFICE STAFF; GUARDSMARK SECURITY AND STAFF; HOUSING URBAN DEVELOPMENT; and THE RENT PROGRAM Defendants. ___________________________________/
**E-filed 3/1/11**
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
No. C 11-00748 RS ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER
United States District Court
11
For the Northern District of California
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
On February 23, 2011, this Court denied pro se plaintiff John Garth's motion for temporary restraining order. On the same day, Garth filed a second motion for temporary restraining order. Although he adds some allegations related to invasion of privacy by a Guardsmark Security Guard, his motion is based on substantially similar grounds as the prior one. For the reasons stated in the prior Order, the motion for temporary restraining order is denied.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: 02/28/2011 RICHARD SEEBORG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
NO. C 11-0748 RS ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER
Dockets.Justia.com
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT A HARD COPY OF THIS ORDER WAS MAILED TO:
John Garth 1515 Market Street Suite 1014 Oakland, CA 94607
DATED: 3/1/11 /s/ Chambers Staff Chambers of Judge Richard Seeborg
United States District Court
11
For the Northern District of California
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
NO. C 11-0748 RS ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?