Mitchell v. Acumed, LLC
Filing
71
ORDER re 70 Status Report. Signed by Judge Nathanael M. Cousins on February 7, 2012. (nclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/7/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
GENESE K. DOPSON (SBN 108333)
Email: Genese.Dopson@WilsonElser.com
BETH FRUECHTENICHT ANEY (SBN 208847)
Email: Beth.Aney@WilsonElser.com
WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ,
EDELMAN & DICKER LLP
525 Market Street, 17th Floor
San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone:
(415) 433-0990
Facsimile:
(415) 434-1370
Attorneys for Defendant,
ACUMED, LLC
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
RANDALL RAY MITCHELL,
12
13
Plaintiff,
v.
14
15
ACUMED, LLC, and DOES 1 through 100,
inclusive,
16
Defendant.
17
18
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: C 11-00752 SC
JOINT STATUS REPORT RE MEET AND
CONFER, DISCOVERY PLAN AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER
19
20
The parties appeared before Hon. Magistrate Judge Nathanial Cousins on January 25, 2012,
21
for the hearing on the Motion to Compel and Motion for Sanctions brought by defendant Acumed
22
LLC, attorney Robert B. Ingram appearing on behalf of plaintiff Randall Ray Mitchell and attorney
23
Genese K. Dopson of Wilson Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker LLP appearing on behalf of
24
Acumed LLC, and a true and correct copy of the reporter’s transcript of said proceeding attached
25
hereto as Exhibit A. .Pursuant to Hon. Magistrate Judge Cousins’ Order at the conclusion of said
26
hearing, attorneys for the parties engaged in a “meet and confer” session on January 31, 2012 to
27
discuss discovery issues and to designate a Discovery Plan. Pursuant to said “meet and confer”
28
plaintiff and defendant submit as follows:
1
JOINT STATUS REPORT RE MEET AND CONFER, DISCOVERY PLAN AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Northern District Court Case No.: C 11-00752 SC
828845.1
1
1.
Acumed LLC’s Request for Production, Set One:
At said “meet and confer”
2
plaintiff produced all documents responsive to Request for Production number 1, namely documents
3
relating to the arbitration proceedings with Kaiser Permanente relating to plaintiff’s alleged injuries
4
to his left wrist due to alleged medical malpractice. Plaintiff also produced all documents
5
responsive to Request for Production number 4, namely a copy of the settlement agreement between
6
plaintiff and Kaiser Permanente. Documents related to requests for production numbers 5 and 6 are
7
voluminous and have been sent to a copy service and will be produced by plaintiff to defendant as
8
soon as copying is completed.
9
2.
Acumed LLC’s Request for Production, Set Two:
Pursuant to the Discovery Plan
10
attached hereto as Exhibit B, Plaintiff will produce the subject medical device on request of
11
defendant Acumed, LLC, on or before June 15, 2012.
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
3.
Acumed LLC’s Interrogatories, Set One: Plaintiff shall serve verified interrogatory
responses by February 15, 2012.
4.
Acumed LLC’s Requests for Admission, Set One: Plaintiff shall serve verified
responses to request for admission, set one, on or before February 10, 2012.
5.
Discovery Plan: The parties have established and agree to the Discovery Plan
attached hereto as Exhibit B.
6.
Other Matters: At this time, the parties have no additional matters which need to be
19
addressed with the exception of Acumed LLC’s request for sanctions and the parties have
20
designated a section in the proposed order for this issue to be addressed.
21
DATED: February 6, 2012
WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ,
EDELMAN & DICKER LLP
/s/ Genese K. Dopson
By:
Beth Fruechtenicht Aney
Attorneys for Defendant
ACUMED, LLC
DATED: February 6, 2012
LAW OFFICE OF J. FRANK GEORGE
LAW OFFICE OF ROBERT B. INGRAM
/s/ Robert B. Ingram
By:
Robert B. Ingram
Attorneys for Plaintiff
RANDALL RAY MITCHELL
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
JOINT STATUS REPORT RE MEET AND CONFER, DISCOVERY PLAN AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Northern District Court Case No.: C 11-00752 SC
828845.1
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER
2
3
After consideration of the briefs argument of counsel, this submission of a joint status report
4
re meet and confer and discovery plan, and all other matters before the Court, IT IS HEREBY
5
ORDERED that:
10
2.
The dates and deadlines set out in the Discovery Plan (Exhibit B) are accepted as dates
and deadlines issued herein;
3.
Court to address sanctions in a separate order.
S
UNIT
ED
12
13
14
Dated: February 7, 2012
ED
ORDER
O
IT IS S
IFIED
S MOD
A
NO
RT
15
thanael M
Judge Na
ER
H
16
RT
U
O
11
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
. Cousins
R NIA
9
deadlines issued herein;
FO
8
The dates and deadlines set out in the Joint Status Report are accepted as dates and
LI
7
1.
A
6
N
F
C
__________________________________________
D IS T IC T O
R
Nathanael M. Cousins
United States Magistrate Judge
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
JOINT STATUS REPORT RE MEET AND CONFER, DISCOVERY PLAN AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Northern District Court Case No.: C 11-00752 SC
828845.1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?