Boyd v. Autozone, Inc. et al

Filing 32

ORDER SCHEDULING TRIAL AND PRETRIAL MATTERS. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 12/23/11. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/23/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 Boyd, No. CV11-00776 JSW 6 7 8 Plaintiff, v. Autozone, Inc., 9 Defendant. 10 / 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court ORDER SCHEDULING TRIAL AND PRETRIAL MATTERS 12 Following the Case Management Conference, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Case 13 Management Statement is adopted, except as expressly modified by this Order. It is further 14 ORDERED that: 15 A. DATES 16 Jury Trial Date: 12/10/2012, at 8:00 a.m., 5 days 17 Pretrial Conference: Monday, 11/19/2012, at 2:00 p.m. 18 Last Day to Hear Dispositive Motions: Friday, 8/10/2012, 9:00 a.m.* 19 Last Day for Expert Discovery: 6/27/2012 20 Last Day for Expert Disclosure: 6/12/2012 21 Close of Non-expert Discovery: 6/28/2012 22 Further Case Management Conference: 8/10/2012, 9:00 a.m.** 23 Joint Supplemental Case Management Statement due: 8/3/2012 24 25 26 *if cross dispositive motions are filed, counsel shall follow the briefing schedule set at the December 16, 2011 Case Management Conference (see minutes at doc. No. 29). 27 **if no dispositive motion hearing is held, the Further CMC will be automatically moved to 1:30 p.m. 28 1 B. DISCOVERY 2 The parties are reminded that a failure voluntarily to disclose information pursuant to 3 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a) or to supplement disclosures or discovery responses 4 pursuant to Rule 26(e) may result in exclusionary sanctions. Thirty days prior to the close of 5 non-expert discovery, lead counsel for each party shall serve and file a certification that all 6 supplementation has been completed. 7 C. ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION 8 This matter is referred to court-connected mediation, to be conducted by April 16, 2012. 9 The parties shall promptly notify the Court whether the case is resolved at the mediation. 10 PROCEDURE FOR AMENDING THIS ORDER No provision of this order may be changed except by written order of this court upon its For the Northern District of California United States District Court D. 11 12 own motion or upon motion of one or more parties made pursuant to Civil. L. R. 7-1 or 7-1-(b) 13 without a showing of very good cause. If the modification sought is an extension of a deadline 14 contained herein, the motion must be brought before expiration of that deadline. The parties 15 may not modify the pretrial schedule by stipulation. A conflict with a court date set after the 16 date of this order does not constitute good cause. The parties are advised that if they stipulate to 17 a change in the discovery schedule, they do so at their own risk. The only discovery schedule 18 that the Court will enforce is the one set in this order. Additionally, briefing schedules that are 19 specifically set by the court may not be altered by stipulation; rather the parties must obtain 20 leave of Court. 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 23 Dated: December 23, 2011 JEFFREY S. WHITE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?