Boyd v. Autozone, Inc. et al

Filing 42

ORDER GRANTING 41 STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE OF BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 6/26/12. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/26/2012)

Case3:11-cv-00776-JSW Document41 Filed06/22/12 Page1 of 3

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

THEODORA R. LEE, Bar No. 129892
LUCAS V. MUNOZ, Bar No. 254900
KYLE E. KELLY, Bar No. 271689
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
650 California Street, 20th Floor
San Francisco, California 94108-2693
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]

MARYLON M. BOYD SBN #139642
LAW OFFICES OF MARYLON M. BOYD
2201 Broadway Street, Suite 815
Oakland, California 94612
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
Attorney for Plaintiff
KARIMAH BOYD

Attorneys for Defendants
AUTOZONE, INC. and JOSH HUGHES

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

KARIMAH BOYD,

12
13
14
15
16

Plaintiff,
v.
AUTOZONE, INC., a Nevada Corporation;
JOSH HUGHES, an individual; and DOES
1 THROUGH 10
Defendants.

CASE NO. 3:11-CV-00776 JSW
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE OF
BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR CROSS
MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Judge:
Ctrm:

Hon. Jeffrey S. White
11, 19th Floor

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
650 California Street
20th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94108.2693
415.433.1940

CASE NO. 3:11-CV-00776 JSW

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE

Case3:11-cv-00776-JSW Document41 Filed06/22/12 Page2 of 3

1
2

The Parties to the above referenced matter, through their under-signed counsel, do
hereby stipulate as follows:

3
4

1.

parties’ cross-dispositive motions such that the initially moving party would file by June 22, 2012;

5
6

WHEREAS the Clerk of the Court continued the briefing schedule on the

2.

WHEREAS the parties were directed to meet and confer regarding the

briefing schedule set by the clerk;

7

3.

WHEREAS the parties did so meet and confer in an attempt to arrive at an

8

acceptable schedule. Due to mutual conflicting obligations, neither party could file its dispositive

9

motion by the June 22, 2012 deadline for the initially moving party, as set by the clerk;

10
11

4.

dispositive motion and have their respective claims determined, if possible, without a trial;

12
13

WHEREAS both parties wish to preserve their procedural right to bring a

5.

WHEREAS the parties with to avoid an unseemly race to file their respective

dispotivie motions, which would prejudice the other party;

14

6.

WHEREAS the parties agree to refrain from filing individual dispositive

15

motions until such time as His Honor rules on this stipulation and proposed rule, so as not to act in

16

bad faith towards one another;

17

7.

WHEREAS trial in this matter is currently set for January 28, 2013, and

18

neither party would be prejudiced by a short continuance in the summary judgment briefing

19

schedule,

20

///

21

///

22

///

23

///

24

///

25

///

26

///

27

///

28

///

LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
650 California Street
20th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94108.2693
415.433.1940

CASE NO. 3:11-CV-00776 JSW

1.

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE

Case3:11-cv-00776-JSW Document41 Filed06/22/12 Page3 of 3

1

The parties do hereby agree as follows:

2

1.

Defendants shall file their dispositive motion by Friday, July 6, 2012;

3

2.

Plaintiff shall file his opposition and cross-motion by Friday August 3, 2012;

4

3.

Defendants shall file their opposition and reply by Friday August 17, 2012;

5

4.

Plaintiff shall file his reply by Friday August 17, 2012;

6
7

SO STIPULATED
DATED: June 22, 2012

/s/ Lucas V. Munoz
THEODORA R. LEE, Bar No. 129892
LUCAS V. MUNOZ, Bar No. 254900
KYLE E. KELLY, Bar No. 271689
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.

8
9
10
11

Attorneys for Defendants
AUTOZONE, INC. and JOSH HUGHES

DATED: June 22, 2012

/s/ Marylon M. Boyd
MARYLON M. BOYD SBN #139642
LAW OFFICES OF MARYLON M. BOYD

12
13

Attorney for Plaintiff
KARIMAH BOYD

14
15
16
17
18

SO ORDERED
DATED: June 26 2012
__,

19

JEFFREY S. WHITE
UNITED STATES COURT DISTRICT JUDGE

20
21
22
23

Firmwide:112647087.1 013306.2169

24
25
26
27
28
CASE NO. 3:11-CV-00776 JSW

2.

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE