McCoy v. Astrue

Filing 11

ORDER for a first extension to file mtoion for summary judgment re 10 Stipulation filed by Rose Anna McCoy Motion (SJ) due by 7/25/2011.. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 6/23/2011. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/24/2011)

Download PDF
Case3:11-cv-00782-CRB Document10 1 2 3 Filed06/21/11 Page1 of 2 GLENN M. CLARK # 91371 MILLER, CLARK, CALVERT & OBENOUR 2222 Martin Luther King Jr. Way Berkeley, California 94704 (510) 848-7200 FAX (510) 848-3500 email mccoattys@hotmail.com 4 Attorney for Plaintiff 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ROSE ANNA MCCOY 12 Plaintiff, 13 Civil No. 11-00782 CRB STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR A FIRST EXTENSION TO FILE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT v. 14 15 16 MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security Administration Defendant. / 17 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the undersigned 18 attorneys, subject to the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff 19 shall have a 30-day extension, or until July 25, 2011, in which 20 to file her Notice, Motion, and Memorandum in Support of Motion 21 for Summary Judgment. 22 This is Plaintiff’s first request for an extension of time 23 in this matter. 24 Respectfully submitted, 25 26 Dated: June 20, 2011 27 28 /S/ Glenn M. Clark GLENN M. CLARK Attorney for Plaintiff Case3:11-cv-00782-CRB Document10 1 MELINDA L. HAAG United States Attorney 2 3 Filed06/21/11 Page2 of 2 Dated: June 21, 2011 4 5 By /S/ Lynn M. Harada (as authorized by email) LYNN M. HARADA Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorneys for Defendant 6 7 ORDER 8 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 17 S R NIA . Breyer J ER FO arles R udge Ch H 16 RT 15 DERED O OR IT IS S NO 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE LI 13 UNIT ED 12 DATED: June 23, 2011 RT U O 11 S DISTRICT TE C TA CHARLES R. BREYER A 9 N F D IS T IC T O R C 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION 11-00782 CRB - 2 -

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?