McCoy v. Astrue
Filing
11
ORDER for a first extension to file mtoion for summary judgment re 10 Stipulation filed by Rose Anna McCoy Motion (SJ) due by 7/25/2011.. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 6/23/2011. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/24/2011)
Case3:11-cv-00782-CRB Document10
1
2
3
Filed06/21/11 Page1 of 2
GLENN M. CLARK # 91371
MILLER, CLARK, CALVERT & OBENOUR
2222 Martin Luther King Jr. Way
Berkeley, California 94704
(510) 848-7200 FAX (510) 848-3500
email mccoattys@hotmail.com
4
Attorney for Plaintiff
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ROSE ANNA MCCOY
12
Plaintiff,
13
Civil No. 11-00782 CRB
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER
FOR A FIRST EXTENSION TO FILE
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
v.
14
15
16
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner
of Social Security Administration
Defendant.
/
17
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the undersigned
18
attorneys, subject to the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff
19
shall have a 30-day extension, or until July 25, 2011, in which
20
to file her Notice, Motion, and Memorandum in Support of Motion
21
for Summary Judgment.
22
This is Plaintiff’s first request for an extension of time
23
in this matter.
24
Respectfully submitted,
25
26
Dated: June 20, 2011
27
28
/S/ Glenn M. Clark
GLENN M. CLARK
Attorney for Plaintiff
Case3:11-cv-00782-CRB Document10
1
MELINDA L. HAAG
United States Attorney
2
3
Filed06/21/11 Page2 of 2
Dated: June 21, 2011
4
5
By /S/ Lynn M. Harada
(as authorized by email)
LYNN M. HARADA
Special Assistant U.S. Attorney
Attorneys for Defendant
6
7
ORDER
8
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
10
17
S
R NIA
. Breyer
J
ER
FO
arles R
udge Ch
H
16
RT
15
DERED
O OR
IT IS S
NO
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
LI
13
UNIT
ED
12
DATED: June 23, 2011
RT
U
O
11
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
CHARLES R. BREYER
A
9
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION 11-00782 CRB - 2 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?